Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Sheehan Lied or is Lying
Published on August 31, 2005 By Dr Guy In Current Events

Well, Cindy Sheehan finally came clean and admitted that it was not the intention of the circus to see President Bush.

"I look back on it, and I am very, very, very grateful he did not meet with me,because we have sparked and galvanized the peace movement," Sheehan told The Associated Press. "If he'd met with me, then I would have gone home, and it would have ended there."

So apparently the purpose was not to see Bush, but to 'galvanize' a peace movement.  And of course allow her to erroneously compare herself to Rosa Parks.

In all honesty, I will say that this is not the real Cindy Sheehan talking, but the Handled one.  And in so admitting, I will also say that she has probably the worst handlers in the history of any politically staged event.  They not only cant control her mouth, they give her the wrong lines to speak. 

Only Sheeple will follow someone so crass and self serving that she disses other Gold Star Moms for not agreeing with her, makes statements out of the KKK playbook, and cant put together 2 coherent statements in a live interview.

Her original stated goal was an admirable one that many people gave her respect for.  Now that it has been shown to be a lie, and she herself just a willing puppet of the loonies on the left, the movement is just a hollow shell.


Comments (Page 9)
10 PagesFirst 7 8 9 10 
on Sep 04, 2005
This is getting really pathetic. I think I will start complaining about your use of profanity dabe. In fact, dabe you seem to be following me from post to post harassing me. Stardock will you do something about this?
on Sep 04, 2005
Dabe - "Period. Somehow, I got sucked into your pompous game, and and now choose to not continue. Sorry to disappoint you in your attempts to ridicule and one up me."

Sorry you feel that way, I was trying to have an intelligent debate. The only thing I was trying to suck you in to was getting the facts straight to support your end of the argument. I responded with historical fact, personal experience and observations on your methods for a more lively debate. Not sure how that turns to pompous. Funny, I was sticking up for your right to argue the point with Dr. Guy and this is how you interpreted it. Oh well.
on Sep 04, 2005
Be careful whip, you might have to deal with the techies as well.
on Sep 04, 2005

I'm sure she was trying to do more than get me blacklisted. It's amazing the amount of profanity she uses around here has no affect.

It does.  But they do give her a lot of leeway.

on Sep 04, 2005

Yes I am, my blog is the DanCave. In fact I was just informed that my blog of the month is a featured article. Still no offers from Fox or MSNBC to be guest expert for a phenomenol amount of money though, so I guess featured just means more people might read the thread.

I read your stuff, but since you were replying anonimously, I was not sure if you were the same.

on Sep 04, 2005

You have no class dabe. Look at you playing the innocent victim and you still can't stop your profanity or your attacks.

Even when she tries to leave potty mouth at home, she cannot refrain from name calling.  Dabe, it really detracts from any points you are trying to make.

on Sep 04, 2005

You know, i get more chuckles from your hysterics than anyone else's here. Please, never stop!

See why I wanted her free?  And oh, where is BRS these days?  Hmmmmm

on Sep 04, 2005

hear Quell shampoo will wipe out your little bug problem, dear

Quell or Prell?

on Sep 04, 2005

I guess I am now included in their conspiracy theories.

If you point out a fault in the left's logic, then you are indeed a member of the VRWC.

on Sep 04, 2005

But, at the same token, the only initial comparison I was making to the vietnam conflict was the galvanization of this country to end the conflict. Period. Somehow, I got sucked into your pompous game, and and now choose to not continue. Sorry to disappoint you in your attempts to ridicule and one up me.

You can step back when you so choose.

on Sep 04, 2005

Stardock techies, have you dealth with the Island Dog issue internally, like you told me you would, or was your email just placation?

You probably need to post that on Karma's thread.  Not here.

on Sep 04, 2005

This is getting really pathetic. I think I will start complaining about your use of profanity dabe. In fact, dabe you seem to be following me from post to post harassing me. Stardock will you do something about this?

Again, it would get noticed better on Karma's thread.

on Sep 04, 2005

Funny, I was sticking up for your right to argue the point with Dr. Guy and this is how you interpreted it. Oh well.

She does bite the hand that feeds her.

on Sep 04, 2005
"I read your stuff, but since you were replying anonimously, I was not sure if you were the same."

Just a minimal effort to maintain some degree of personal space. These are fiery topics and sometimes they can be downright nasty and sometimes people may want to use personal information to trash a person or retaliate for an idea contrary to their own. You will notice that I do a pretty conscience job of not getting too personal or attacking in replies to those who reply to me. I am hoping to keep it that way for myself as well. Trash my ideas or approach, just not me.

This is my way of expressing my opinions and thoughts on difficult topics and seeing what others have to say so I don't get bored with myself. I am long ago past the days of wanting personal confrontation over an idea. I have kids for that.
on Sep 04, 2005

I have kids for that.

yea, they tend to mellow us out quickly in these matters!  What is more important. Iran or your Daughter's first date?  Uh, huh!

10 PagesFirst 7 8 9 10