Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Sheehan Lied or is Lying
Published on August 31, 2005 By Dr Guy In Current Events

Well, Cindy Sheehan finally came clean and admitted that it was not the intention of the circus to see President Bush.

"I look back on it, and I am very, very, very grateful he did not meet with me,because we have sparked and galvanized the peace movement," Sheehan told The Associated Press. "If he'd met with me, then I would have gone home, and it would have ended there."

So apparently the purpose was not to see Bush, but to 'galvanize' a peace movement.  And of course allow her to erroneously compare herself to Rosa Parks.

In all honesty, I will say that this is not the real Cindy Sheehan talking, but the Handled one.  And in so admitting, I will also say that she has probably the worst handlers in the history of any politically staged event.  They not only cant control her mouth, they give her the wrong lines to speak. 

Only Sheeple will follow someone so crass and self serving that she disses other Gold Star Moms for not agreeing with her, makes statements out of the KKK playbook, and cant put together 2 coherent statements in a live interview.

Her original stated goal was an admirable one that many people gave her respect for.  Now that it has been shown to be a lie, and she herself just a willing puppet of the loonies on the left, the movement is just a hollow shell.


Comments (Page 7)
10 PagesFirst 5 6 7 8 9  Last
on Sep 02, 2005
still tend to believe my own memory when it comes to your age, dabe,(that you are in your 40s, not 50's, unless of course you lied about that in the first place, which is understandable. Many wrinkly old spinsters routinely knock 10 years off their age when asked)but if it's true, I'm sure you were one of the first in line to spit on our returning soldiers, calling them baby killers and rapists.


Excuse me, whip, but this wasn't a simple "mistake". Karma, she is backtracking from her defamation, and it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to see through her shallow cover up. Kind of points to the fact that she does know what the hell she said and did. I swear, Guy will back her up even if she murdered someone.
on Sep 02, 2005
As far as I am concerned, government websites are inherently biased. No surprise there. Mainstream media is nothing but a bunch of apologists for this dubya regime. Newsmax, well, what can I say about newsmax? It's a rightwing based righty skewed crap that one can only laugh at. You, dear puppy, are not capable of determining what is acceptable journalism. What a joke.


I can't believe how people like this actually walk the streets. The media is not friendly to Bush in anyway, and you think they are apologists. How funny.



am only calling the puppy what he is. An adolescent dog. A puppy. Besides, I still don't even believe you are a woman. Probably a self-loathing adolescent black male.


Typical dabe once again. You blacklist me from your own posts but you still want to trash me in another. Typical.
on Sep 02, 2005
Typical dabe once again. You blacklist me from your own posts but you still want to trash me in another.


Do you want to make public what it took to get you blacklisted? It wasn't easy folks, and it took a few emails to stardock techs. Go ahead, puppy, give me an excuse.
on Sep 03, 2005
Dabe - "It wasn't easy folks, and it took a few emails to stardock techs. Go ahead, puppy, give me an excuse."

Then do not participate. You make a statement in one of your posts about how the current Admin is trying stifle investigative journalism and then threaten to try and silence someone who disagrees with you? I have not seen any name calling from anyone that is any worse than any of your name calling. The only diffrence seems to be that you are so self-righteous about your beliefs that you think you are justified when you do it. Or that you are justified in trying to silence someone who disagrees or says something you do not like.

You can not hope to get people to listen to you if you act out of such blatant hypocrisy. If your points are justified and backed up with facts you do not have to resort to such things to win an argument or get a point across. If any one person gets blacklisted from here based on complaints from you, the only fair thing is to also blacklist you as an active participant in whatever was deemed inappropriate.

Think about what you are saying, threatening to silence someone to have a perceived win of an argement does not win you anything, it marginalizes you. You do a disservice to those you say you support. Geez, even your anti-Christ Bush did not do that with Sheehan. In fact he defended her right to have her opinion. Can you step up to that same plate like the real democracy loving American you portray yourself to be?
on Sep 03, 2005
Oh yesh, I almost forgot. "adolescent black male.". You claim to be part of a movement that stands for equality and justice and then make a racially charged comment like that? You make a statement that portrays being an adolescent black male as a negative thing and insult? You have lost all perspective and managed to defeat yourself.
on Sep 03, 2005
Do you want to make public what it took to get you blacklisted? It wasn't easy folks, and it took a few emails to stardock techs. Go ahead, puppy, give me an excuse.


Please dabe go ahead. I never used anything close to the profantiy you use here. I will admit I have made comments some would consider "insults", but nothing close to the hate and profanity that gets you a vacation from here.
on Sep 03, 2005
Oh yesh, I almost forgot. "adolescent black male.". You claim to be part of a movement that stands for equality and justice and then make a racially charged comment like that? You make a statement that portrays being an adolescent black male as a negative thing and insult? You have lost all perspective and managed to defeat yourself.


Dan, I don't know who you are, but my comment was not intended to be racist, other than pointed at whips racist tendencies. You obviously don't know her history. She accuses me of lying, so I just accused her of lying, but I did so in a very transparent manner that, as I said, pointed at whip's racism.

Puppy, getting you blacklisted had nothing to do with foul lanquage. It's because I am totally convinced you are a full-blown idiot, and nothing you say is worthy of anything.

Being called a racist by dan is meaningless to me, as my attmept was to point out your racism, whipsy. He doesn't seem to understand that, and frankly, I don't care. You, on the other hand, are a self described racist, proving over and over and over again that by by your own racist posts, that you are just a small minded ignoramus, and to which an awful lot of posters here are sick of. You may have distanced yourself from the KKK 15 years ago, but you are still of their mindset. Now, go get a life.
on Sep 03, 2005
Puppy, getting you blacklisted had nothing to do with foul lanquage. It's because I am totally convinced you are a full-blown idiot, and nothing you say is worthy of anything.


If that's the case you should have been blacklisted from everybodies posts. It seems you don't like being called out and having to prove your allegations. Typical.
on Sep 03, 2005
Dabe, I can understand you regret for your flippant remark, but there is no amount of excuses or trying to say, "The devil made me say it" that will change the fact that you said it. Take some responsibility for yourself and your mistakes and maybe you will grow from the experience. Remember, Dabe, you are the one who has been claiming to be part of the higher moral ground here by claiming association with a movement, the others have only been saying they have a conflicting opinion on the original subject.

I did not call you a racist, I said it was a racially charged remark and contrary to the tenets of the "movement" you try to associate yourself with. You did not say it was an attempt to show how someone else thinks, you stated it as your own thought in an attempt to insult another person. Your own words betray you, not me or anyone else.

I have seen the other posters' remarks. Both good and bad, many just as emotional and lacking actual substance, but none trying to portray themselves as something above that as you have done. I originally tried to engage you in a debate about the Viet Nam-Iraq comparison you were trying to make. I then noticed that you did seem to be interested in an actual intelligent and fact based debate, but one that merely repeats someone else's party line. In effect you came across to me as a political groupie, not a real independent thinker. I tried several gentle suggestions and observations to get you pointed to a real discussion, but you have let your emotions and unwillingness to take responsibility for your own words or responsibility to work at your opinions interfere with coherent thought.

I would say just cut your losses on this one and quietly step out of it. Learn from the experience and try to be a little better prepared next time you want debate a sensitive issue.
on Sep 03, 2005
I'm sure she was trying to do more than get me blacklisted. It's amazing the amount of profanity she uses around here has no affect.
on Sep 03, 2005

~chuckles at some middle aged woman being (perhaps erroneously, perhaps not) mistaken for 10 years YOUNGER than she is being called "defamation."~

Defamation or definition?

on Sep 03, 2005

Excuse me, whip, but this wasn't a simple "mistake". Karma, she is backtracking from her defamation, and it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to see through her shallow cover up. Kind of points to the fact that she does know what the hell she said and did. I swear, Guy will back her up even if she murdered someone.

Dont get me involved with your squabble.  I have not commented on this.

on Sep 03, 2005

Typical dabe once again. You blacklist me from your own posts but you still want to trash me in another. Typical.

Point ID.  Dont attack if you have them BLed

on Sep 03, 2005

Do you want to make public what it took to get you blacklisted? It wasn't easy folks, and it took a few emails to stardock techs. Go ahead, puppy, give me an excuse.

Splain Lucy

on Sep 03, 2005
I'm sure she was trying to do more than get me blacklisted.


Wrong. All I wanted and requested is that you be blacklisted. I couldn't get you blacklisted because of this lil bug thang, turned out to be you, a cockroach. Haven't the admins discussed it with you yet? Banishment for your deviousness would be appropriate, I would think. but I didn't request it. that's up to the admins.
10 PagesFirst 5 6 7 8 9  Last