Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
I Think Hillary is losing her trolley!
Published on January 25, 2005 By Dr Guy In Politics

Seems Hillary Clinton is blaming Bush for the rise in Abortions.  Now does not that sound strange in light of the numerous affairs that Bill has had?

But I guess cigars are non-impregnating!

If there was ever a reason to support abortion, it was in the case of Mrs. Rodham, about 55 years ago!


Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Jan 28, 2005
Post partum abortions????!!!!

That's pretty funny.


Wether you say it, "Post Partum Abortion" or "Retroactive abortion" it is still funny since neither are actually possible. The whole idea of either word is pretty oxymoronic, and few puns are more fun than those based on oxymoron. ;~D
on Jan 28, 2005

Post partum abortions????!!!!

That's pretty funny.

Watch South Park. Cartman's mother.

on Jan 28, 2005

Wether you say it, "Post Partum Abortion" or "Retroactive abortion" it is still funny since neither are actually possible. The whole idea of either word is pretty oxymoronic, and few puns are more fun than those based on oxymoron. ;~D

Think so?  Wait till a defense lawyer uses that in a case where a mother abandons a new born baby.  It wont be funny then, and you know NARAL will support the defense, as they supported Scott Peterson.

on Jan 28, 2005
Think so? Wait till a defense lawyer uses that in a case where a mother abandons a new born baby. It wont be funny then, and you know NARAL will support the defense, as they supported Scott Peterson.


Actually I think most things that lawyers do are funny, and they would be considered jokes if the educated idiot on the bench had the common sense to laugh in the face of the lawyers as they thow them out of their courts and into jail for wasting the overtaxed court system's time and resources. ;~D

NARAL? Just another special interest group who replace facts for mindless buzzwords and get rich off others who don't know the difference.
on Jan 28, 2005
Sorry, i dont buy into platitudes, I go for actions. They stood against Ca when they wanted to do a double murder charge against Scott Peterson. Even tho, at the time, and even today, it is not known if his son was born before or after the act.


I am not sure what you are referring to here. There is a rumor flying around that NARAL helped to pay Peterson's defense fees, but that was bogus. As for viability, NARAL's position is:

NARAL Pro-Choice America supports the legal framework established in Roe v. Wade and does not oppose restrictions on post-viability abortions, such as California's, that contain adequate exceptions to protect the life and health of the woman.


Pure and unadulterated BS!!!


Really? Are you going to tell me what I believe too? I am pro-choice but not pro-abortion. My position has nothing to do with the actual act of abortion-- I just don't think the government should regulate my uterus. Please, do not be so arrogant as to think that you know all. My statement stands and I am a testiment to the fact that pro-choice doesn't mean pro-abortion. You might think it is just a buzzword--but pro-choice sums up my position much better than pro-abortion. I also think pro-life is a bad term because I am not anti-life. I think the camps are pro-choice and anti-choice. It is about the right to legislate a woman's body.
on Jan 28, 2005

Reply #35 By: shadesofgrey - 1/28/2005 11:41:22 AM Really? Are you going to tell me what I believe too? I am pro-choice but not pro-abortion. My position has nothing to do with the actual act of abortion-- I just don't think the government should regulate my uterus. Please, do not be so arrogant as to think that you know all. My statement stands and I am a testiment to the fact that pro-choice doesn't mean pro-abortion. You might think it is just a buzzword--but pro-choice sums up my position much better than pro-abortion. I also think pro-life is a bad term because I am not anti-life. I think the camps are pro-choice and anti-choice. It is about the right to legislate a woman's body.


No! It's about the taking or giving of human life. The original abortion bill was a good thing. But what they have now is a perverted pile of crapola!
BTW if you don't like the term pro-life then talk to the abortionists. They're the ones who coined the phrase.
on Jan 28, 2005
apparently bush okayed 157 post-partum abortions while governor of texas.  that would make him pro-death/life?  talk about a flip-flopper
on Jan 28, 2005
BTW if you don't like the term pro-life then talk to the abortionists.


I can't tell you who coined the phrase, nor do I know who you are referring to when you say "abortionists" (I assume the medical doctors who perform the abortions, but I can't be sure), but I do know that when I was temping for NARAL Pro-choice America, they used "pro-choice" and "anti-choice."

No! It's about the taking or giving of human life.


That is what the issue is for you. For me the issue is legislating my body. I was explaining why I use the terminology that I use, not saying that you had to agree with me. Did you catch the part where I say: "I think"? Your response of "No" is pretty amusing--are you in my brain? Do you know what I think? Probably not.

You are intitled to your opinions, and I to mine.

on Jan 28, 2005
f there was ever a reason to support abortion, it was in the case of Mrs. Rodham, about 55 years ago!


This here is an example of being so far right that you are kissing left's ass...
on Jan 28, 2005

This here is an example of being so far right that you are kissing left's ass...


and an insightful to ms watkins.

on Jan 28, 2005

I am not sure what you are referring to here. There is a rumor flying around that NARAL helped to pay Peterson's defense fees, but that was bogus. As for viability, NARAL's position is:

When the DA wanted to charge Peterson with 2 counts of Murder, NARAL fought it on the grounds it would infringe on the rights of women to have abortions.  That without the knowledge that Conner had been born alive or not.  They can talk the talk, but they cannot walk the walk.

on Jan 28, 2005

apparently bush okayed 157 post-partum abortions while governor of texas. that would make him pro-death/life? talk about a flip-flopper

No, a Post Partum Abortion is the abortion of an innocent life, just like Abortion. It is just a matter of time.

And if you read even a modicum on the power of the texas Governor, you would see that he does not have the power to commute a sentence, only delay an execution.  Their power is very limited.

on Jan 28, 2005

This here is an example of being so far right that you are kissing left's ass...

Au Contraire.  I did not say all liberals, or even some or most.  I specifically stated one.  WOuld you think the world would be better off had Stalin not been born?

Dont Assume.

on Jan 28, 2005
I also think pro-life is a bad term because I am not anti-life. I think the camps are pro-choice and anti-choice. It is about the right to legislate a woman's body.


Ironic that you agree that "pro life" is a mindless buzzword, but dive into the "pro choice" rhetoric hook, line and sinker. No, I'm not so arrogant that I would try to tell you what you believe. You did a great job of describing it yourself. I merely shared my opinion that "pro choice" is a buzzword just like "pro life".

I think the camps are pro-choice and anti-choice. It is about the right to legislate a woman's body.


It's not just about "the right to legislate a woman's body", it's about the "choosing" whether another human being should live or die at the mother's convenience and whim. Unless you can explain to me how an organism with its own metabolism, and Human DNA that doesn't match any other organism, can be anything other than an a living human being, then we are talking about the right to choose death for her offspring.

Also, if it's truly all about "the right to legislate a woman's body" try finding a reputable doctor who would remove a healthy uterus from you and throw it away. It would be hard to find one because, well, mutilation is both unethical and illegal.
3 Pages1 2 3