Lots of progressive groups have put their weight behind "Occupy Wallstreet", as has George Soros (who made his fortune with speculation) and the government of Iran*.

The entire thing is rubbish.

(*Incidentally, why do progressive groups always end up on the same side as homophobic sexists?)

Not repealing it is not the same as supporting it.  Before barney Frank and maxine waters did their dance with Fannie and Freddie, and their extortion with the banks, it had no teeth.  Once they started the extortion, it got its teeth, and Bush did indeed sound the alarm.  to no avail.

It is on the organizations web site.  That makes it theirs.  Now if they all endorse it is another argument.  But as it is on their website (occupywallst.org), you have to attribute it to them.

About the same as Mikey Moron and George Soros.

of course it is!  It is merely being propped up by the anti-semites in the democrat party, and their willing sycophants in the media.  I had one of the cretins try to tell me that the anti-war protesters of the 60s and 70s did not spit on the troops (I witnessed it, and also had my older sister admit to it).  They are lying, trying to create a grass root movement out of wax paper.

"Before barney Frank and maxine waters did their dance with Fannie and Freddie, and their extortion with the banks, it had no teeth"

It still has no teeth.  All it does is require banks to do some lending in the same areas in which they have branches if they want to merge.

"It is on the organizations web site.  That makes it theirs"

Really? Even though their site explicitly states that it is not their list but simply a post from one of their forums users? I'm suspect the owner of this site would disagree with that kind of "logic".

"of course it is!  It is merely being propped up by the anti-semites in the democrat party"

Amazing how the self righteous often defer to others with different points of views as racists and/or bigots.

"You loan or you get investigated and audited by the IRS". - Like I said, the teeth are there.

Really.  I doubt the owner of the site is smart enough to know logic.  But you do not post what you do not endorse - unless it is a board.  That is not a discussion board.

There are 2 kinds of people I cannot tolerate.  Bigots and hypocrites.  That is why I cannot stand liberals.  It is not about different points of views, it is about them yelling (and waving their signs) all those anti-semitic statements.

"You loan or you get investigated and audited by the IRS"

Did you think this one up while wearing your aluminum foil hat?

"But you do not post what you do not endorse - unless it is a board.  That is not a discussion board."

Like I said it was posted on their forum....And this is in fact called a forum as well.

"There are 2 kinds of people I cannot tolerate.  Bigots and hypocrites."

There is a certain amount of of hypocrisy when you whine about certain things said about the TEA Party and then do the exact same thing about others.

No, but if you check the congressional record, you will find similar verbiage.  Couched in politicalese.

Uh, no.  I found it on their front page.

I do not whine.  I do challenge people to back up spurious allegations.  If you make a charge, back it up.  I hardly find that hypocritical.  Like I said, I found their manifesto on their home page.  If you can show anything I wrote as being false, I will retract it.  I have done so in the past. 

"I do challenge people to back up spurious allegations"

You did no such such thing.....You did the same thing SOME others do, You took the actions of a couple of individuals and try to paint an entire group with the actions of only those individuals. 

The thread was that I "whined" about people posting spurious allegations.  I replied that I challenged them to back up the allegations.  You challenged me on my statement. I backed it up.  So I am not mad or angry that you decided to challenge me since that is what I do to others.  It is not hypocrisy as anyone can back up their allegations.  That does not mean I will like the proof, but I will not debate facts.  Allegations, I will challenge, facts I will not.

I am careful to back up my posts (unless pure opinion in which case I will make that clear) with facts.  That is not the case with most of the allegations I challenge, and indeed, upon being challenged, I usually hear no more about it since they cannot back up their allegations.  hence they are opinions, not facts.

Now, as far as my language, we may disagree on the wording.  Rampant is not universal.  I said rampant and I do believe it and have provided NUMEROUS examples of it (check my blog history).  You may quibble with how rampant, but I did not say it was all.  The difference I was attempting to point out here, is that the right does ostracize their loons - the left embraces them.  Again, these are general statements that exceptions can be found for.  But if you are going to allege that the right is embracing bad behavior from the Tea Party, I challenge you to find the bad behavior, and then the embracing of it.  Which is what I did here with the left.

So I refute your allegation, and stand by the evidence presented.

  "But if you are going to allege that the right is embracing bad behavior from the Tea Party, I challenge you to find the bad behavior, and then the embracing of it.  Which is what I did here with the left."

You do nothing of the sort. You do point out "bad behavior" .  But saying that people who support the movement support those examples of bad behavior simply because they support the movement is rediculous.  You are doing exactly the same thing that was done with the Tea Party by others.

No, they are supporting the movement, and NOT refuting the dirt that goes along with it.  Again, if you care to make the allegations with the Tea Party, that has bent over backwards to distance itself from the dirt, you are welcome to, and will be proved wrong.

These cretins have embraced the filth, they have not repudiated it.  Birds of a feather and all......

"Again, if you care to make the allegations with the Tea Party"

I don't. I'm not like you who thinks if you're not on one side you're on the other.  Plain and simple I believe everyone has the right to assembly and to peacefully protest. There is always a few in a crowd that have views unlike my own, or do and say things that I don't agree with. Not publicly repudiating individuals is not embracing them, often it is simply ignoring them. 

If your purpose was repudiating bad behavior you would have simply done that. Instead you did something entirely different. So don't bother trying to make others believe that your purpose is something other than what it really isy because what it really is is VERY transparent.

Sorry you do not understand what this is all about.  I have not demanded any of the protestors be arrested or the protest be broken up.  But this is just the latest in a series of articles I read (again, I have not hidden my history of articles) demonstrating that the true racist and bigots (and yes, even gay haters) are on the left.  Theirs is not a peaceful protest (how about the 14 year old in Dallas, the heroin dealer in Philly, the love spouting clown in Dayton, or the violence in Oakland?).  If they were peaceful, this article would never be written.  But I did not include all the anti-semitism they have displayed.

So yes, I was not trying to hide what this article was about.  That you thought it was something else, perhaps you can assist me in bettering my composition skills.  But I am glad you now understand this is not about banning protestors or inciting fear.  It is about pointing out the hypocrisy of the left.