Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Published on June 22, 2006 By Dr Guy In Politics

Back in the days before the Civil war, there was generally considered to be 2 kinds of blacks.  Free Men and slaves.  Free Men, through work or a twinge of conscious of their former masters, were just that.  Free people.  And as such, they enjoyed all the rights granted to other citizens of the US.  They could vote, they could own property, they could marry and raise a family.  They were citizens.

After the war, all the blacks were Free Men (Men used in this sense of Homosapiens, not the masculine gender - although women still could not vote in those days).  Jump to the present.

It seems that these Free Men are now defined in another way.  They think for themselves.  And as such, they do not always parrot a party line.  Sometimes they are liberal (Barak Obama comes to mind as a free thinker of that persuasion) or a conservative.  But woe be to the Free Man that has left the liberal plantation and become a conservative!  For then they are treated like the worst slaves of the Ante Bellum South.  One needs look no further than the supposed PC slurs leveled against Michael Steele this year, and now the smear that Robert Kennedy Jr. is trying to paint Ken Blackwell with.

Long after the election of 04 was decided, long after the allegations of fraud and disenfranchisement were put to rest, long after Kerry decided he Supported the war before he was against it, Robert Kennedy Jr. took a page from Dan Rather and in a hatchet job, attempted to smear the former Secretary of State of Ohio - Ken Blackwell.

His hatchet job was not an honest mistake, or even poor journalist investigation.  It is plain and simple, a smear job.  Refuted not by some right wing publication, but by several of the admittedly liberal media outlets that are at the center of the controversy.  Pointing out the glaring lies, and omissions of a smear job against a politician whose 2 crimes are being black and being conservative.

For that is indeed the anathema of liberals.  If Blacks ever realize they are free men, and can vote any way they want, the democrats are doomed to long period of being a permanent minority party.  Oh, they welcome the votes of blacks, and feed them scraps from the table of power.  But no blacks have any real power in the DNC.  Just look at what they did to Maynard Jackson and McCall.

And in their fear of losing power, and seeing it slip away, all bets are off, all civility is thrown to the wind, and the democrats of today look a lot like the Democrats of 1870, and for that matter 1964.  They use the race card against republicans at every turn, yet that obviously does not work when the republican is black, so they resort to racism themselves.

And the Kennedys are no different.  Instead of bringing America to a higher standard, they perpetuate racism so that they can then turn and warn blacks "See!  You are still victims".  What they do not tell blacks is, yes they are victims.  But not of society or conservatives.  They are victims of liberal racism.

This year, there are 3 blacks that are running for a major office, 2 governorships and a senate seat.  And all have a shot of winning.  And all have been subjected to some of the worst forms of racism since the Ante Bellum south.  But this racism is not coming from the Aryan Nation, or the Klu Klux Klan.  It is coming from the DNC and its leadership. 

Slave holders hated Free Men.  So do Liberals.


Comments (Page 3)
4 Pages1 2 3 4 
on Jun 23, 2006
"it was my understanding the 1964 voters' rights act was gonna sail right thru. so why are republicans--and not just those from the southern states altho they seem to be the in the majority--now doing what they can to stall the vote?"


Because it still requires federal oversight for a few southern states based upon their actions from a long, long time ago, and frankly that is insipid. There's no more institutionalized racism there than there is in New York or anywhere else.
on Jun 24, 2006
Beat around the bush, avoid the primary point at all costs.
on Jun 24, 2006
the primary point being ? 3 black republican candidates are being treated worse than slaves while the rest of black america votes for democrats cuz they're suckers.
on Jun 24, 2006
a long, long time ago,


forty-two years is not a long, long time ago.

which of the southern states is currently districted to provide its black citizens with representation equal to their demographics?
on Jun 24, 2006
until earlier this month, the official state of ohio online voter registration process--operated by secretary of state blackwell--was more difficult and took longer than did the one blackwell provided on his campaign website.
on Jun 24, 2006
A period of time wherein everyone who was in charge then is now most likely dead is a long, long time. Federal oversight of state elections is wonky enough in my opinion, but when you have a skewed standard directed at 9 states because of acts that occured 50 years ago... well, I doubt you'd call that constitutional.

The states in quesion are: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia. Granted, history isn't kind to them in terms of the civil rights era, but frankly when just standing around can get you shot 40+ times in New York... or maybe even sodomized with a plunger... IF you are black... I'm thinkin that the playing feild is pretty much even now.
on Jun 24, 2006

Why else would you use the word "worst", if you truly believe that all racism is equal?

I do, so how does that make the efforts against Steele, Blackwell, and Swan worse than the Jim Crow of the 50s?  You bring up a murder.  Not a racism charge - a murder, that was adjudicated and the perps given the death sentence.  And how is that to compare?  So to you, not all racism is the same.  That perpetuated by liberals is not as bad as that perpetuated by non-liberals (for all we know, the murderers of the Black man were liberal - the reports never said).

on Jun 24, 2006

you got this part wrong btw. blackwell is the current secretary of state. his performance there seems to me more than enuff reason to vote against him.

First, you are correct.  I should have said "SOS at the time of the 04 elections".

d. blackwell has managed to prevent the green party candidate for governor (the same seat blackwell hopes to win) from qualifying for the upcoming election even tho the greens have produced twice the number of qualifying signatures required by law.

Second, that blows all your other points to smithereens.  If he was as dirty as you alleged (and I notice you dont speak ill of liberal blacks ever), then he would have pencil whipped that candidate through as it would have helped him!

The rest of your post is not worth quoting for one simple reason.  It is YOUR typical double standard of lies, innuendos and half truths.  He is by far more honorable or as honorable as any liberal black Politician serving in a major office.

But of course since he is a conservative, he is 'whipped' by the new white liberal massas.

on Jun 24, 2006

Why don't you try to address the main point of the article instead of a single sentence? Is it because you can't or you're ashamed?

They cant.  That is why they try to change the subject.

on Jun 24, 2006

it was my understanding the 1964 voters' rights act was gonna sail right thru. so why are republicans--and not just those from the southern states altho they seem to be the in the majority--now doing what they can to stall the vote?

Perhaps you have your dates wrong?  The 1964 Voter's rights act did not sail through thanks to democrats like Sheets byrd.  It did pass.  The non permanent sections are up for a revote and should be voted down, but will not be.  It matters not who is on the right side (eliminating this dead dinosaur).  The only thing it does is perpetuate racial gerrymandering now.  It is long over due to die.  But it will pass because it suits both parties.

Now go check out nancy Pelosi's travel vouchers for your next scandal and quit trying to create scandals where none exist.  or at least get better informed.

on Jun 24, 2006

you've very shamefully trivialized the horrors visited upon black human beings for several hundred years in the ante-bellum south.

No, you have very shamefully purposefully missed the point and decided to ignore it.  And that is what this article is all about.  how you excuse racism and its actions when it is a liberal doing it.  I would explain it to you, but I think it would go over your head once more.

on Jun 24, 2006

Bullshit

Thank you

on Jun 24, 2006

seems to me ya gotta be disgustingly chauvinistic to suggest blacks will eventually regain the power of sight, lose their fear, stumble out of their rut and wise up and begin supporting the gop.

Seems to me that only a racist bigot would think otherwise.  That a blackman could think for himself.  I never put you that low before kb.

on Jun 24, 2006

only if you can name one current black candidate who's running as a republican who was lynched, castrated, beaten to death or otherwise treated 'like the worst slaves of the ante-bellum south.'

Since you refuse to even read the article, I will just issue you a challenge to name one liberal one.  That has experienced any kind of racism running for office.

kb, I really thought you were more intelligent.  Apparently I am wrong.  Fine, if you refuse to address the article, then think about this.  What is worse for a man.  To die a hero or live a coward? 

Death is easy.  Living as a second class citizen is a life time of abuse.  You want to rate them?  Go right ahead.  You have already stated in your previous response, that you believe that no blackman can think for himself, so I guess you will never understand.

on Jun 24, 2006

Because it still requires federal oversight for a few southern states based upon their actions from a long, long time ago, and frankly that is insipid.

it is perpetuated simply because it makes safe districts for both parties.  Not for righting any wrongs.

4 Pages1 2 3 4