Ah yes, taking a page from Howard Dean, the democrats are now parroting their illustrious leader and have decided that you are guilty until proven innocent!  Yes, it seems that they are condemning Bush for the {SHOCK} audacity to opine that Tom Delay is innocent!  That cannot be allowed!  Even tho no trial has occurred, and according to the constitution, Tom delay IS IN FACT innocent at this point.  No, Throw that stupid document away!  The very fact that Tom Delay has been charged means he MUST be guilty and to state the obvious is a breach of conduct that is totally unforgivable!

During an interview Wednesday on the Fox News Channel, Bush was asked whether he believes DeLay is innocent of the charges of money laundering and conspiracy that led to his indictment in Texas and resignation from the House Republican leadership in September. "Yes, I do," the president replied.

Note the interviewer asked if he "Believes", and the president said "yes I do".  Simple question, and simple and correct answer to the question.

But no!  The democrats have decreed that you must say he is guilty!  Even tho he has not been tried!  That master of the mental defect, Harry Reid, launched into a screed:

"To have someone of his stature, the president of the United States, prejudge a case is something I've never seen before."

See the idiocy?  Reid is guilty of what he accuses the president of!  Unless! Unless you get rid of the constitution!  That pesky document that says everyone, even republicans, are due a fair trial, before being judged guilty!  But no, the democrats want everyone to believe that Delay is already guilty, and to state the obvious truth, that he is not guilty, is to prejudge the case!

With logic like that, you sometimes have to wonder how they form coherent thoughts.  Wait, I cant remember the last time they did!

Oh well, never mind. Just another case of democrats engaging mouth and not brain again.