Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Published on November 12, 2005 By Dr Guy In Current Events

I recently penned an article where I opined that perhaps for cretins like the president of Iran, we need not use force, just circulate rumors.  And those rumors would then incite their followers to kill them.

Well, Al Qaeda has done me one better.  They are actually following the president of Iran's advice and attacking fellow Muslims!  Why?  because there MAY have been (I understand that 1 American was among the dead) staying at the hotels they targeted.  Instead, these whack jobs killed a lot of innocent Muslims, including the Fathers of the Bride and Groom at a wedding.  (Side Note:  My heart goes out to this couple.  On the day that should have been the most joyous, now they will always remember it was the one they lost their fathers).

And the Jordanians are not laying down and taking it!  Nor are the Palestinians who reportedly lost 17 of their own there!  They were shell shocked after it happened.  now they are mad!  And I say more power to them!  While I do not condone their silence when London or Madrid was bombed, it took the killing of their own to wake up (Much like the French now are).  For Terrorists (not freedom fighters, not insurgents - terrorists!  Or as one calls them - Bacteria) are no ones friend.  They are just blood thirsty killers.  Much in the same mold as Jeffrey Dahmer, John Gacy and Charles Manson.

And when they cant reach out and kill their faux enemies, they strike at what is convenient.  for they dare not confront a true army.  They must kill innocent civilians. 

Now that Al Qaeda has started killing their potential supporters, perhaps the real Muslims will see that hate is not the answer.  And Al Qaeda has only hate.  Just a burning, irrational insane hate.

I don't want to see any more innocents killed to pull the true Muslims out of their myopia about terrorists.  I hope this one episode is enough to inflame the entire Muslim world against them.

That is my hope at least, and so far, it looks like a good start to it.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Nov 14, 2005

CIA Mossad and Jordanian Intelligence carry out false flag operations and claim responsibilityh on FICITICIOUS AL QUEADA

Proof?  Or just your black copter tin foil hat rantings?

The latter no doubt.

on Nov 14, 2005
Check out the frontpage of whatreallyhappened dot com

The above is a photo of damage to the Hyatt from the recent bombing. We are being told that this bombing attack was carried out by "suicide bombers" wearing explosive belts. We are being told there is no truth to initial reports that the bombs were hidden above the ceilings (or that Israelis were yet again given advance warnings to leave).

Take a look at this photo. Does that look like a bomb went off about waist-high, or in fact exploded downward from the ceiling.

Where is the blood splatter? If you wrap a belt around yourself like the one they claim and detonate it, you make a really big gooey bloody mess. The wall is clean.

Is the "confession" a repeat of the infamous phony "Kuwaiti nurse"?


on Nov 14, 2005

Where is the blood splatter? If you wrap a belt around yourself like the one they claim and detonate it, you make a really big gooey bloody mess. The wall is clean.

You tinfoil people amuse me!  I guess the Mossad did it right after taking out the twin towers as well.

on Nov 14, 2005
CIA Mossad and Jordanian Intelligence carry out false flag operations and claim responsibilityh on FICITICIOUS AL QUEADA


Oh gawd you are a wack job, listen here first Al Queada claimed it on their web site, then the wife of the bomber who tried to kill herself admitted it. How much more proof do you need? Do they have to go to your door and pass out their litature?!!

Check out the frontpage of whatreallyhappened dot comThe above is a photo of damage to the Hyatt from the recent bombing. We are being told that this bombing attack was carried out by "suicide bombers" wearing explosive belts. We are being told there is no truth to initial reports that the bombs were hidden above the ceilings (or that Israelis were yet again given advance warnings to leave).

Quote one creditable source of information. Get AP News, CNN, Reuters, Fox News, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, BCC, Euope News or any news agency to back these LIES up. Come on Caviar (anonymous user) and rombios, produce real documentation that the CIA/Mossad did this when Al Queada is clamining responsibility. Why are you trying to discredit the bacteria of the region. Don't you want them to gain power in the world?!!

on Nov 14, 2005

Come on Caviar (anonymous user) and rombios, produce real documentation that the CIA/Mossad did this when Al Queada is clamining responsibility. Why are you trying to discredit the bacteria of the region. Don't you want them to gain power in the world?!!

They cant because it does not exist.  But as long as they can slam the US and Israel, being the racists they are, anything goes.

on Nov 15, 2005

Reply By: rombios(Anonymous User)

I told you not to post on my blog after your callous and nasty comment to Brad.

on Nov 17, 2005

"Now that Al Qaeda has started killing their potential supporters, perhaps the real Muslims will see that hate is not the answer. And Al Qaeda has only hate. Just a burning, irrational insane hate."

C'est désolant encore un fois de lire ce genre de simplisme insidieux à l'égard des peuples arabes et des musulmans ...La plupart des gens n'aspirent qu'à vivre dignement et dans la tranquilité, avec leurs revendications, leurs malaises et leurs différences et n'ont quoi que ce soit à secouer d'Al Qaeda ... Le malheur ce n'est pas Ben Laden mais c'est la quasi inéxistence de démocratie dans le monde arabo-musulman ...

P.-S. : je vous rappelle que ce terrorisme a frappé dans plusieurs pays arabes bien avant 9/11 .
on Nov 17, 2005

C'est désolant encore un fois de lire ce genre de simplisme insidieux à l'égard des peuples arabes et des musulmans ...La plupart des gens n'aspirent qu'à vivre dignement et dans la tranquilité, avec leurs revendications, leurs malaises et leurs différences et n'ont quoi que ce soit à secouer d'Al Qaeda ... Le malheur ce n'est pas Ben Laden mais c'est la quasi inéxistence de démocratie dans le monde arabo-musulman ...

P.-S. : je vous rappelle que ce terrorisme a frappé dans plusieurs pays arabes bien avant 9/11 .

When you had Palestinians cheering as the towers fell, that was a very telling picture.  While this kind of terrorism may have been in Arab countries prior to 9-11, it is just now that they are seeing that Al Qaeda is not their friend and saviour.  And it is only by alienating their potential allies that Al Qaeda will be erradicated from the face of the planet.

I would remind you that the only requirement for evil to trumph is for good men to do nothing.  Perhaps it is time for the good men of the Arab world to now stand up and start denouncing monsters for what they are.

on Nov 17, 2005
Je pense que l'essentiel est ailleurs, ce n'est pas dans les clichés, ils existent de part et d'autre ...Cependant, quand les USA assoment l'Irak quasi unilatéralement, seuls les terroristes peuvent s'en réjouir, une sorte de victoire gratuite, en feedback. L'air de rien, ce qui peut être parfois pratique peut s'avérer éperdument chaotique et désastreux !!!
En retour, le terrorisme ne peut qu'enrégimenter , de plus belle, dans tous les ressentiments, misères et injustices. Comme d'autres extrémismes, l'islamisme violent aura toujours, mais de moins en moins, un soutien limité. Pourtant, le large soutien dont il jouit aujourd’hui vient de ce que les musulmans ont la conviction que l’Occident les a toujours lésés. C’est l’indifférence occidentale envers les intérêts " musulmans", comme en Palestine , la duplicité des discours qui ont légitimé l'emploi de la violence, comme en Irak ... Toute société a sa part d'exrémisme et d'aliénation. A chacun son Al Qaida. Mais la question problématique qui s'impose est de savoir pourquoi, à un moment donné de l’Histoire, l’influence d’un tel réseau - Al Qaida - outrepasse les limites de la marginalité. Pourquoi il fusionne avec des revendications historiques, fédère des mouvements qui pré-existaient, et les transforme en machines de guerre qu’ils n’étaient pas ...

blogalement votre !
on Nov 17, 2005

Reply By: mar'ouki

I guess there is not a lot we can do about the perception.  For indeed, we got into the middle east via Saddam and his invasion of Kuwait.  We had no choice, and that is apparently what set them off, in your view.

As for Palestine, where is Bin Laden to help them?  That is the biggest hypocrisy of them all as not a single Arab state has lifted a finger to help them!

That is the true reality, but perception is all that counts.  So as longas they percieve us to be the agressors and indifferent to the issues of Muslims, they are going to be antagonistic.  I do understand that.  That is why Al Queda blowing up their own in Jordan (and Iran threatening Arab states as well) is working to the West's advantage.  And against the extremist.

on Nov 17, 2005
Je sens comme un relent rageur de vendetta dans vos propos. Une illusion de pouvoir absolu en sourdine.

Pour la Palestine,depuis quand les américains font quoi que ce soit de constructif, leurs VETOS passionnels à la chaîne ont toujours sévi au profit d'Israél aux Nations-Unies, c'est de notoriété publique. Le peuple palestinien n'attend rien des USA, à part leur neutralité diplomatique positive et qu'ils cessent de l'investir de toutes les culpabilités. Personne n'oubliera le caractère colonial et historique de ce conflit. Vous avez parlé de perception, je pense que la question terroriste ne cessera d'agir sur votre perception du conflit israélo-palestinien.

MAXIME RODINSON disait en 1967 : « on n'arrivera pas à la paix en disant aux arabes qu'ils ont le devoir d'applaudir leurs conquérants parce que ceux-ci sont européens ..., parce qu'ils sont "développés", parce qu'ils sont révolutionnaires ou socialistes, encore moins parce qu'ils sont tout simplement juifs.»

¨Pour l'Irak, je ne ne peux que constater votre mémoire sélective. La libération du Koweit est une chose, l'abandon des chiites à leur sort - Saddam Hossein ne s'en priveras pas - est une autre. Le mégalo sanguinaire était déjà fidèle à son image de marque ...

POURQUOI INSCRIRE VOS RAPPORTS A L'AUTRE EN TERMES D'ANTAGONISME VERTICAL ET NON DE DIFFERENCE ???
on Nov 18, 2005

Reply By: mar'ouki

Posted: Thursday, November 17, 2005

You misunderstood my response.  I am not giving excuses, only causes.  I am not excusing the abandonment of the Shiites, nor am I excusing our backing of Israel.  Those are facts and past tense.  It is also a fact that since the 70s, the US has tried to broker a peace between Israel and other Arab nations, including Palestinians. 

But you miss an important point, that while I have not stated it yet, is a fact.  The Arabs are going to have to learn to get along with each other and Israel.  The only ultimate solution is genocide.  And I dont think it will be the Israelis that are wiped out.  They can accept a neighbor, they do not have to love them.  But to continue to try to erase Israel, when they cant even live with their brothers who may just believe in a different version of Islam, is only a recipe for disaster.  Of their own making.

You are right in one respect.  It is their choice.  They can make the right one, or one that leads to their extinction.  That is not a threat, or a boast.  It is merely a reflection of history.

on Nov 18, 2005

Reply By: mar'ouki

Perhaps you should talk to the clowns that dont know what the hell they are doing?

"Your star is fading. You will not escape your fate, you descendant of traitors. We will be able to reach your head and chop it off," al-Zarqawi said, referring to the king.

2 Pages1 2