Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Fingers down
Published on September 9, 2005 By Dr Guy In Current Events

Everyone wants to point fingers at who dropped the ball when it comes to the relief of New Orleans.  Brown, Bush, Blanco and Nagin all have reaped a healthy dose of culpability.  But as another blogger already pointed out, the only real screaming seems to be coming from Louisiana, while Florida, Alabama and Mississippi seem to be just going about he business of the clean up and burying the dead.

But the problem in Louisiana was made a lot worse by the Levees break (Led Zeppelin rif running through my head at this point).  They were not designed to take a category 4 storm, and for a change, something built by the government performed exactly as designed.

So we will leave the disaster relief blame game for a moment and concentrate on why the Levees were not designed or bolstered for a more powerful storm.

First, lack of money was and is not really an issue.  Billions have been poured into Louisiana over the past 10 years for work on the Levees, but through mismanagement, fraud, and out right theft, never got to the levees.  Louisiana refused to provide matching funds, so many federal dollars went unspent.  And other projects got the cake, while the levees got the shaft (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/07/AR2005090702462.html).  This is not a mysterious little known fact, but a very overt one.  And while Blanco was not governor that whole time, she was governor for part of it.

And what family has run Louisiana for the last half century (since the Days of Huey P. Long)?  The Landrieus!  First moon, and now son and daughter have their death grip (pun intended) on that state, and it is one of the worst states when it comes to keeping politicians out of jail.  So there is a lot of finger pointing, but the 3 finger rule is more than appropriate here.  The ones to blame are the ones that have been sucking that state dry for so long.

But who else INTENTIONALLY thwarted the bolstering of the Levees?  This should not be brain teaser for anyone.  Just think of Luddites.  Yes, those greens of compassion, who even now are crowing about their ability to thwart any levee project (http://louisiana.sierraclub.org/atchafalaya.asp)  on the Atchafalaya river basin (the Mississippi's twin).  They would rather save a few terns than a thousand people.

It is not like these Levees are so that a bunch of rich snobs can have resort homes on the waterfront.  As has been pointed out, New Orleans is a working city that is the gateway to the mighty Mississippi and 2/3rds of the grain shipments of the US (along with a huge Petro-Chemical point).  These Levees are to hold back those waters, so that the grain and oil can flow.  But since that endangers a bunch of brown breasted sump beetles, all of that is for naught in the Luddites campaign.  They care not for people, for it is people that destroy nature and are not a part of nature (wrong Luddites! People are a part of nature).

So let the finger pointing begin and end where it Belongs.  The disaster of New Orleans would not have happened if the politicians of Louisiana had done their work and bolstered the levees and the Luddites would have gone to California to hug a Thistlecone Pine.

And people wonder why I call them Luddites?


Comments
on Sep 09, 2005
Let's not forget America's Rivers.org and Audobon Officials with the blame either.  I hope that Yellow Bellied Sap Sucker was worth the pain.
on Sep 09, 2005
Gov. Blonco has a page on the governor's office website Link that pretty much shoots holes in any excuse about not having funding to protect New Orleans from echoing a Led Zeppelin song...

Louisiana ranks 5th in the latest Generosity Index, despite ranking 44th in the nation in earnings, according to IRS data. The Generosity Index notes that Louisiana residents gave more than $1.2 billion in donations in 2002 (Ellis L. Phillips Foundation, January 2003). http://www.catalogueforphilanthropy.org/cfp/db/generosity.php

Louisiana was one of 18 states to be awarded Renewal Community designations and the only state in the south to earn four. As a result of the Renewal Community designations, approved by Congress and administered by HUD, Louisiana will receive regulatory relief and tax breaks to help existing and new businesses provide more jobs and promote community revitalization. Louisiana businesses will be eligible to share in $17 billion in tax incentives to stimulate job growth, promote economic development and create affordable housing. The Renewal Community designation tax incentives are good for 7 years (HUD, 2001). www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/ezec/index.cfm

Louisiana is first in dollars spent for historic preservation. Louisiana spent more than a third of a billion in FY 2000, creating more than 9,000 jobs (National Park Service, 2000).


Hmmmm, so what she is saying here is, they had the means to raise $18,533,333,333 for charitible donations, Community Renewal and Historic Preservation (all of which are worthy causes I will admit). I wonder how much of that $18.5 billion went to projects that are now history because they couldn't come up with matching funds to help reinforce the levees.

I really don't know what could or couldn't have been done to mitigate the threat posed by the levees and floodwalls... but if Gov. Blonco, Mayor Nagin (or anyone else) is going to make political hay out of whether there was money available or now.. they need to read this whole webpage. Most of it is impressive, and leaves any excuse about funding floating in the much and the mire of their shortsidedness.
on Sep 09, 2005

Most of it is impressive, and leaves any excuse about funding floating in the much and the mire of their shortsidedness.

I dont know if Blanco is corrupt or not, and I know the whole situation is not her fault, but Louisiana is either the 1st or 3rd ranked state for electged officials behind bars, and the corruption of the Longs and now the Landrieus are well known both in and outside the state.

on Sep 09, 2005
They can come up with any excuses they want, these politicians. The fact is they have a lot to answer for when this crisis is over. Perhaps this is supposed to be their time in the limelight of exposure because it was most certainly needed! Too bad it has happened at the expense of the whole city!
on Sep 09, 2005

Too bad it has happened at the expense of the whole city!

Even with the waste and destruction, I somehow dont see Louisiana politics changing because of it.

on Sep 09, 2005
Unfortunately you have it all wrong. You did not really concentrate on why the levees were not built to withstand more powerful storms. You need to go back 40 years not just 10 to figure that one out. Google hurricane Betsy and ACOE. 1965

The Army Corp of Engineers is responsible for maintenance and improvements of the levee system so that is where you need to start looking. I'll leave it to the professionals to argue whether the ACOE's plans were timely in response to the initial warnings in light of new technologies that meteorologists and civil engineers made as to the fate of New Orleans, but those in the federal government who slashed the ACOE's budget for proposed projects to improve the levees truly have no where to hide.

on Sep 10, 2005

Unfortunately you have it all wrong.

No, if the state had the money and the opportunity to fix it for the last 10 years and did not, then the fault lies with them, and the reason they did not.  And one of the biggest reasons was the luddites that would rather save a stupid bird than 10,000 people.

on Sep 11, 2005
The state could have funded other projects to supplement the levees, however the levees and floodwalls lie under the domain of the ACOE which is a federal funded agency.
on Sep 11, 2005
Yes, the Army Corps of Engineers will have something to answer for here also. Even with the "cuts", the levees in New Orleans are still among the biggest parts of the ACOE's budget.

The "New Orleans Comprehensive Emergency Plan" lists under "Future Plans":

B. Future Plans

Future mitigation plans include:



1. Drainage network management.

2. Protection of wetlands and marshes.

3. Floodplain management.

4. Preservation of the levee system.

5. Providing hurricane shelter.

6. Restricting imprudent development.

7. Mitigation actions following natural disasters and post?disaster plan development.


So they did consider the levees their reponsibility, they just figured they'd get around to it after everything more important was taken care of. Considering their track record for sticking to their own protocols, my guess is, they won't even after (or if) the city is rebuilt.
on Sep 11, 2005

The state could have funded other projects to supplement the levees, however the levees and floodwalls lie under the domain of the ACOE which is a federal funded agency.

They lie under the domain of the state.  As is clear from the evidence.

The Hep me, Hep me, I am a wounded duck,

Syndrome dont buy it.  You got a leak in your basement and I give you money to fix it, and then you blame me for it?

Lame, very lame. and stupid.

on Sep 11, 2005

So they did consider the levees their reponsibility, they just figured they'd get around to it after everything more important was taken care of. Considering their track record for sticking to their own protocols, my guess is, they won't even after (or if) the city is rebuilt.

LIke My neighbor will get around to pumping out my house after giving me the pump, after I refused to use it.

Yea, It is my fault, because I did not use it before I was an idiiot.