Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
More to Follow?
Published on September 2, 2005 By Dr Guy In Current Events

Just after Katrina made New Orleans a soup bowl, and the gulf coast look like an Indonesian coast on December 27th, several people, here and elsewhere, opined that while America was the first to help others during disasters, other countries shied away from US because we are the 'Big Kid" on the block.

But now we see that many other Countries are indeed ponying up to the Charity trough, and offering help. And while the support is not a lot in real terms, that is not important.  What is important, is that the offers were made because these countries, like the US, believe in helping your neighbors who are down on their luck even if you are not Jay Rockefeller.

State Department officials said it was likely some of the offers would not materialize and, as a wealthy nation, the United States would be uncomfortable taking funds from poorer countries.

The above statement in itself is very telling.  I think all of us would feel somewhat guilty for accepting a donation from a Poor person, when we know we are better off (even if our house just did burn down).  But I think we should accept all offers, for the offer is being made in good faith and out of chairty.  We can always then turn around and help those poor countries in ways that will return their generosity many fold, but I would Vote to let them do what they want, and not turn any away.

I hope the Administration chooses to accept all offers.  America may be bigger than other countries, but we bleed when cut, we mourn our dead, and we put our pants on one leg at a time.  Just like every other country on this planet.

"
Comments
on Sep 02, 2005

Canada, Russia, Japan, France, Germany, Britain, China, Australia, Jamaica, Honduras, Greece, Venezuela, the Organization of American States, NATO, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Greece, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Mexico, South Korea, Israel and the United Arab Emirates.

Note the bolded country.  How many reading this blog know that China offered to help the US after the 06 Earthquake, but were refused?  I think that was very small of the American Administration at the time.

on Sep 02, 2005
I think China, along with Jamaica and the Dominican Republic are all interesting on this list because we all know that they have been through these kinds of things themselves so they probably more than sympathize with what is going on in New Orleans.
on Sep 02, 2005

I think China, along with Jamaica and the Dominican Republic are all interesting on this list because we all know that they have been through these kinds of things themselves so they probably more than sympathize with what is going on in New Orleans.

I would add Honduras as well.  I think Gilbert sideswiped them a few years ago.

on Sep 02, 2005
Did you say "gulf coast"? Yeah, you did. Nuff said.
on Sep 03, 2005
Note the bolded country. How many reading this blog know that China offered to help the US after the 06 Earthquake, but were refused? I think that was very small of the American Administration at the time.


06 earthquake? You lost me there.

on Sep 03, 2005
"said it was likely some of the offers would not materialize"

Don't think the rest of the world is holding off because this is America, most of the aid pledged for the Tsunami countries didn't get there. The reason is that nations manage their budgets very carefully and only allow very small amounts for aid from these budgets.


I also find it quite shocking that billions are being spent each month in Iraq and some of your own people are in grave danger of death and looting and in comparison very little is being done.
on Sep 03, 2005

Note the bolded country. How many reading this blog know that China offered to help the US after the 06 Earthquake, but were refused? I think that was very small of the American Administration at the time.


06 earthquake? You lost me there.

I believe he's refering to the earthquake of 1906, at which point the United States didn't really "accept" aid from anyone, much as we don't now.  Why should malice be read into our acceptance or denial of aid?  We can afford to take care of ourselves so we don't have to take aid from others, and if you are refering to the 1906 earthquake, China was in much worse shape at the time.

on Sep 04, 2005

Did you say "gulf coast"? Yeah, you did. Nuff said.

Dont see your point.  Hurricanes are not spawned over land, and regardless of their final destination, if they hit land, the coast gets it first,

on Sep 04, 2005

06 earthquake? You lost me there.

The SF Earthquake of 1906.

on Sep 04, 2005

I also find it quite shocking that billions are being spent each month in Iraq and some of your own people are in grave danger of death and looting and in comparison very little is being done.

A lot is being done, but that does not make the news like the sensationalism of the press.  But you can find out exactly what is being done if you stray beyond the headlines of the MSM.

on Sep 04, 2005

Why should malice be read into our acceptance or denial of aid? We can afford to take care of ourselves so we don't have to take aid from others, and if you are refering to the 1906 earthquake, China was in much worse shape at the time.

But the offer comes from the heart, and should be accepted with gratitude for the offeror.  As I said, we can always return the favor many fold in the future.  I understand that it is not kosher for America to accept aid.  And I think that is part of the reason for the perception of arrogance.

on Sep 06, 2005

The list is growing:

Australia, Austria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Belgium, Canada,
China, Columbia, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El
Salvador, France, Germany, Guatemala, Greece, Guyana, Honduras,
Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan,
Jordan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand,
Norway, Paraguay, Philippines, Portugal, South Korea, Russia, Saudi
Arabia, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Switzerland, Sweden,
Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom, the United Arab Emirates,
and Venezuela.

on Sep 06, 2005
State Department officials said it was likely some of the offers would not materialize and, as a wealthy nation, the United States would be uncomfortable taking funds from poorer countries.


This is interesting, because Rice said in a speech on Friday that all offers would be accepted in the spirit that they were offered. She did say that it might be a while before the US can accept them just on the basis of logistics alone.
on Sep 06, 2005

This is interesting, because Rice said in a speech on Friday that all offers would be accepted in the spirit that they were offered. She did say that it might be a while before the US can accept them just on the basis of logistics alone.

She is one Classy lady!  And everything she has done so far, just reinforces my (extremely) High opinion of her!