The left accuses the right of being homophobes.  But who uese the homophobe card?  Well, lets see what the left is saying:

1. He didn't get married until he was 40. That's really late. Now, he's a devout Catholic, so you know he didn't have sex before he got married (at least not heterosexual sex).
   
   
2. He married a (female) partner at a major law firm. My wife is on the cusp of partnerhood and I never see her. I don't think that my parents had sex after my dad made partner (don't try to tell me otherwise). You think that they have sex?
   
   
3. He has kids, therefore he must have had sex with a woman? Nope. They're adopted.
   
   
4. Possibly most damning: He played Peppermint Patty in his school play. That's totally gay. And cross-dressing.

And this is just on John Roberts!  But what about one of their own?  David Souter perhaps?  Ah, but he was nominated by a conservative!  And here are the spurrilous allegations!

"This is a man who has never been married, never had children," noted one widely quoted observer, a prominent lawyer who, reported R.W. Apple Jr. in the New York Times, "asked not to be identified because he practices from time to time before the Court." . . . This statement was quoted and alluded to so often that Souter soon became pegged as the Curious Bachelor from New England.

So who is playing the homophobe card?  All these statements were made by the left against 2 justices.  the one they missed was Thomas who they accused of being the "long dong silver".  A reference to the myth that blacks are well endowed.

So who uses these cards?  And who does the ACT UP and others support?  Seems that ACT UP are the latest uncle Toms to the liberal wing.  They are just too stupid to realize it.