Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
It is all about Pro Choice is it not?
Published on May 5, 2005 By Dr Guy In Politics

Liberals are quick to try a guilt trip on anyone that says they want a choice.

IN which charities to contribute to. yet of Course what they are really saying is that you cant have a choice.  you must support our charities.

Why?  Why must I contribute to a charity that siphons off 74% of the money for their overhead, and not to one that only takes 15%?

Because the first is the feds and the latter is (gasp!) a religions based one. 

For the religious based one, I dont have to join their order, I dont have to beleive their doctrine!  But I cant take MY money and give it to them to help out the poor.  No, I have to give it to the Liberal one that wastes 75 cents of every dollar.

And their response?  We must be compassionate.

How is it being compassionate to waste 75% of your money on a boondoggle!  Would it not be better to judiciously put it where it does the most good?

no.  Why? Because it is not their charity.

You see liberals dont care about charity with their money.  just check out the Tax returns for Gore and Kerry.

They are only magnanimous with YOUR money!  Then they can claim - what a good boy am I!  For finding a plum in our pudding.

if they really wanted to be taken seriously, they would donate more of their money than I do, to the Charities of their choice!  And that could be the Feds!  No one says it cannot be!

Except them.  you cant donate to their charity.  They have to confiscate your money for their purposes.  that it does no good is beside the point.  That the local mission does a better job is just oe of those right wing nut job cases!

So they give our money to their causes, and try to shame us that we are not generous.

I will match tax returns with any of them.  So far none have taken me up on that wager.  None can win.


Comments
on May 05, 2005
Agreed. Heaven forbid some people actually support a religious charity! While I'm sure not every left-leaning person is totally ant-religion at all costs, it does often seem that their agenda of anti-freedom, ant-religion, and anti-captalism far out paces their help the poor agenda.

We've all seen how efficient the government is in all areas and yet they still insist that only the government can effectively dole out charity. I don't get it. Almost sounds like a Douglas Adams story.
on May 05, 2005
We've all seen how efficient the government is in all areas and yet they still insist that only the government can effectively dole out charity. I don't get it. Almost sounds like a Douglas Adams story.


They are a one trick pony, and have forgotten how to learn others. They have already shown they cannot come up with new ideas, and instead of trying, they just worship at the alter of failed ones.

And their sheep bleat, but they are growing fewer and fewer.

And so they will always be condemned to minority status until they start thinking outside the box.