Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Pay a tax!
Published on March 11, 2005 By Dr Guy In Politics

Ah those zany democrat legislators are at it again!  Let's see, we had the roosters with boxing gloves and the 'hip hugger crack showing' fines fellows from Oklahoma and Virginia.

Now we have some clown in florida that wants to tax toilet paper!  Not sewage.  Not water, toilet paper!  The rationale goes, the more paper you use, the more full of shit you are! (Politicians must use it by the case load then!).

This is so stupid, it has to be funny!  But can you imagine the outrage?  WHat about the people who refuse to wipe because it would cost too much (Ok Parated2k, insert your famous quote here)!  Or who dont wipe enough to 'conserve' their now precious luxury item (as defined by what is taxed witha  luxury tax).

Or how about this!  The proposed law is discriminatory!  It penalizes females much more than males!  When was the last time Tom, Dick or Harry wiped after peeing?

When was the last time a woman (French excluded) did not?  It is patently obvious to any man who is married to a woman, that the major users of TP are women!  Just watch that roll disappear when you have a house full of them (as I had growing up and then 2 daughters!).

I think that all the women of the USA and indeed more importantly, Florida, should stand uup and demand that this discriminatory tax be flushed down the toilet!

Ladies, you have not come this far to be thrust back into discrimination by some male clown that stands and pees!


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Mar 12, 2005
Not only are you full of shit, you're a lying sack of shit. You personally attacked at least COL Gene and me. So, get off that high horse, you incompentent ass. God, I hate liars.


"people like Dabe or COL Gene" - that is what you should have read, not what you think you read, but what was written.

If you see a liar, than I would suggest you are looking in a mirror.
on Mar 12, 2005
God, I hate liars.


Oh, lest I forget... I bet you really loved Bill Clinton then, didn't you?
on Mar 12, 2005
Oh, wait, I guess along the lines I forsaw your response and your comments in several places saying I was "full of" and the words somehow stuck with me long enough to add behind your name when I was typing it.

I guess had I not written your own stupid personal attacks first, I may not have been so easily led down the path of responding somewhat in kind.

It is however nice to see that you can so easily dish out, yet not have anything come close in return. Typical of most liberals that I know. Ooops, am I personally attacking someone in that comment. Better be careful that I don't accidentally target someone and hit them with any collateral damage.
on Mar 12, 2005
In case it isn't obvious to Dabe where the name calling he (or she) seems to be hatin' on started:

https://www.politicalmachine.com/forums.asp?MID=3&CMID=3&AID=68057#530071

See:

Reply #8 By: dabe - 3/10/2005 6:54:23 PM
I WILL NEVER SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Get used to it.


Reply #12 By: dabe - 3/11/2005 2:04:59 PM
blacklist me. see if i give a rat's ass. you freakin dipshit



Or:

https://www.politicalmachine.com/forums.asp?MID=3&CMID=3&AID=68009#528506

Reply #3 By: dabe - 3/9/2005 7:38:49 PM
THAT MEANS THAT ANYONE OLDER THAN 55 MUST SHUT THE HELL UP AND STAY OUT OF THE DISCUSSION. This isn't your problem.


I'm 54 years old. I guess that leaves me SOL. What about my kids? Am I not supposed to worry about them? The HELL this isn't my problem. How freakin' arrogant of you to suggest this isn't my problem. Damn, this is about us, you and me and our kids, and our kid's kids. WTF???????


followed by:

Reply #6 By: dabe - 3/10/2005 7:26:06 AM
Why the AARP is lobbying against these changes has far more to do with the fact that they don't want competition for their own insurance plans and financial services than the fact that they feel these plans are a bad thing.


So you say. As if I'd take your word for it. My opinion is that the above statement is abject bullshit. And, I will NOT STFU.

Go pound sand.............



So Dabe, would you again care to point out some personal attacks that are against the TOS ? Before you do, again, try looking in the mirror.
on Mar 12, 2005
It penalizes females much more than males!


Talk about your triple entendre!

Cheers,
Daiwa
on Mar 13, 2005
I'll take that as a high compliment!! Thank you!!


You deserve it! Keep em coming. My groaner quotient is very high, so I can always use some more!
on Mar 13, 2005
Hmmmmmmmmmmm... this thread gives the term "newspaper recycling" a new meaning


Ok, You get a groaner and cookie for that one! Glad to see you back in form too!
on Mar 13, 2005
My point is, we should look at the point he is trying to make when suggesting such a tax. Obviously, the bill will get flushed, so to speak. But the problem of overtaxed (no pun intended) septic disposal in a vunerable coastal area that is experiencing population booms is very significant. Something needs to be done. This is the overriding point, not toilet paper.


Very well put. But as you rightly point out, there are other ways. Maryland already has a tax on sewage that goes to clean up the Chesapeake bay. While it will not catch all poopers, it is fair and effective. So something can and is being done, but the subject is TP unfortunately as legislators are not always thinking straight when they pose these laws!
on Mar 13, 2005
All I can say after having read your link, terp, and seeing that you mentioned me, by name, in your article (which is consistently a bad habit of yours, which is also against TOS), is you are full of SHIT.


Damn, I give you an insightful and then have to give you a tsk tsk! let it go. You made a good comment and I welcomed it and said so. Dont take flame bait here.
on Mar 13, 2005
Talk about your triple entendre!


I missed that one, can you elaborate? Triple?
on Mar 13, 2005
#13 by Manopeace
Saturday, March 12, 2005


Mano, Dabe and Terp, while I enjoy the points, I prefer topics relevant to the topic much more. Please take your flame war to another blog as any other comments off topic here, I will delete. Equally as I think this is a humorous topic that all can at least agree on some aspect of. We do not need to get into a pissing contest here, nor will I allow any more comments off topic.

Now, any one have the NY times? I have to take a dump and cant afford the tax.
on Mar 13, 2005
Now, any one have the NY times? I have to take a dump and cant afford the tax.


I prefer the Baltimore Sun papers or in an emergency the Washington Post. The Sun's paper quality seems more appropriate (and the writing certainly makes it more appropriate). The Washington Post can sometimes actually be useful for other purposes.
on Mar 13, 2005
I prefer the Baltimore Sun papers or in an emergency the Washington Post. The Sun's paper quality seems more appropriate (and the writing certainly makes it more appropriate). The Washington Post can sometimes actually be useful for other purposes.


Ok, that is in the stream! I have never seen the Sun, so I will have to defer to you.

I kind of like the hometown one, the Times Disgrace. It does leave a black streak, but it is soft and useful for the purpose!
on Mar 13, 2005
Damn, I give you an insightful and then have to give you a tsk tsk! let it go. You made a good comment and I welcomed it and said so. Dont take flame bait here.


Thanks, Guy. I am sorry, but I still don't understand why terpy had to trash me in another thread, for which I didn't even comment in. Kind of stunned me a bit. But, I will let it drop. I've got better things to do. thanks again.
2 Pages1 2