Democrats, Party of Compassion?

Or Conniption?

Published on January 6, 2005 By Dr Guy In Democrat

It appears that Al Gore Jr won something in 2000 after all. The Hearts and (what there is of them) minds of some of the democrat Elites and of course all the loonies that see nothing but conspiracies behind every hanging chad (right Dopey Doe?).

Now,instead of starting to plan for their truimphant return to the White house in 2008, these cretins of pettiness are wasting taxpayer money in Ohio demanding a recount that will not change any results and probably not any numbers, at a cost of millions to you and me (if you live in Ohio - next year coming to a state near you).

If that were not bad enough, now we have the loopy luddites stating they will contest the certification of the vote in Congress! And, even worse than 2000, they have enlisted Sen. Pit Bull, errr I mean Boxer to second the motion from the Senate side so they can waste 100 hours (maximum) of Congress' time questioning the states votes. (oh, wait! If they are tied up that long, then they cant screw us in that time! That might be good!).

All for what? IN the end, nothing will change. Maybe come voter attitudes as they become 'disenfranchised' with the chicanery of the party of Conniption fits. After all, not all of the people who voted for the Democrats are loony, loopy or a luddite. Some are very intelligent, and will he hard pressed to support idiots on parade, errr, ummm, these Congress people. Hopefully.

Comments

whoman69

on Jan 06, 2005

I have no idea what this has to do with compassion. They are not trying to challenge the vote or get it overturned in any way. The are simply trying to make sure that future elections in this country. We have an election in Ohio that would not have been overturned but has been filled with questions. We have two consecutive votes in Florida that have been questioned, one of which decided the whole election of 2000, and we have screwy results in Washington's gubernatorial race. One would think that after 2000 these matter would be looked into by all states. I also have to question how the state campaign manager of a particular candidate can be trusted to certify the results.

Myrrander

on Jan 06, 2005

I heard a bit about some Kerry "die-hards" that are still trying to challenge the election. Plus, I got a nice e-mail from Mike Moore today begging me to contact my Senator to challenge election results. I was going to post about it today, but I think your thread does the job just fine, so I'll just leave a comment here.

Dear Kerry Diehards and Mike Moore: *pbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbt*

Have a virtual raspberry from me.

I mean, "MoveOn.org" can't seem to do just that. Move on. Get over it. John Kerry himself has said that he doesn't challenge the results of the election. But he's got protestors outside his home in Boston trying to get him to fight a useless and expensive legal battle which can only serve to A) Divide the country furthur,

Make people who are already apathetic about the government even moreso, and C) Take up the President's valuable time with garbage. I mean, I used to get mad by all the time Bill Clinton had to waste answering Whitewater allegations -- so why would I now want George W. Bush to have HIS time wasted? So I didn't vote for the guy, so what? He's still got a job to do, so let's let him do it.

I don't consider myself a Democrat, so I don't feel bad criticising them. To say "Democrats = compassionate; Republicans = uncaring" is a false dichotomy dreamed up by a few media knuckleheads who like things to be simple so that their little brains can talk about them in small, monosyllabic grunts.

End of rant. But good post. You'll earn my *insightful* for it today.

Dr Guy

on Jan 06, 2005

Then you obviously have not been following the news. Try this link for starters

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,143510,00.html

And you state questionable results in Fla in both 2000, and 2004. However, the Florida results in 2000 were recounted and under every standard in legal use in the state, Bush won in 2000, and the results were not even close in 2004. And no one that I know of objected to the legal recounts of all votes, just the count of votes not made (try making a dimpled chad).

Finally, Katherine Harris was required BY LAW (something you may want to brush up on) to do just what she did. She had no choice in the matter. It was her job. or are you advocating breaking the law when it suits your purpose?

So you advocate wasting taxpayer money to the tune of several million dollars, and I bet you also are screaming at the deficits Bush is running up.

Loony, Loopy and Luddites.

MythicalMino

on Jan 06, 2005

one of the more interesting things about all this, i think.....is that the dems have been screeching that we all should work together....reach across the aisle....and now this? Yeah....oh, and for anyone who really doesn't think this is to challenge the RESULTS.....use your head. They are still trying to change the results of the election...interesting how a select few (dabe, whoman come directly to mind) challenge anything and everything that any politician that is not democrat tries to do (hey, those politicians are EVIL i tell ya!!)....but this thing here, led up by democrats, is "A-OK"....hey, they are trying to make things BETTER for the comman man.

This is all a joke...lets waste valuable time, challenging the results of an election, that their own candidate has stated could not be overturned.....lets waste more tax dollars (hey, couldn't this money be used for more important things, like helping the almighty UN....or sending more aid to India....or wait....couldn't it be better to use it to drive down the debt? oh...maybe not....this is for a "holy" purpose...to get rid of the anti-christ bush...).

I told many ppl before the election...that no matter who wins, i hope the loser bows out gracefully....well, the loser did....but the losers sure as hell ain't

Dr Guy

on Jan 06, 2005

MythicalMino,

You get an insightful! Very well said. Not all of the people who voted for Kerry are losers, but a lot of losers sure voted for him!

Moderateman

on Jan 06, 2005

Reply By: whoman69Posted: Thursday, January 06, 2005I have no idea what this has to do with compassion. They are not trying to challenge the vote or get it overturned in any way. The are simply trying to make sure that future elections in this country. We have an election in Ohio that would not have been overturned but has been filled with questions. We have two consecutive votes in Florida that have been questioned, one of which decided the whole election of 2000, and we have screwy results in Washington's gubernatorial race. One would think that after 2000 these matter would be looked into by all states. I also have to question how the state campaign manager of a particular candidate can be trusted to certify the results.

would the demoncrapick party be doing this if THEY won ohio??? I THINK NOT

Moderateman

on Jan 06, 2005

good post drguy short to the point with minimal rant time {you ok?} lmaooooooo

Dr Guy

on Jan 06, 2005

good post drguy short to the point with minimal rant time {you ok?} lmaooooooo

Actually, this is so stupid, that I wanted to make it clear that most Liberals/Democrats were not part of the Loony, Loopy, Luddite Left! Even John Kerry is running away from this, and HE was the candidate!

Maybe I should have put this under Humor instead of Politics.........nah! No one would have believed it then!

drmiler

on Jan 06, 2005

Reply #2 By: whoman69 - 1/6/2005 10:24:24 AM
I have no idea what this has to do with compassion. They are not trying to challenge the vote or get it overturned in any way. The are simply trying to make sure that future elections in this country

BS! If that is *truly* the case then why are they not questioning places like Wisconson where voter fraud is known to have taken place? No they're challenging Ohio so that in the end they can say..Uh-huh looky *another* election stolen by the republicans.

Dr Guy

on Jan 06, 2005

Or Washington State where there are 8000 more ballots got Governor than registerd voters in democrat countines? Surely if they were the party of Compassion, they would be calling for a full investigation there! Guess they just want to invoke the 5th on Wisconsin and Washington.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!