You would think after being burned once that they would learn. But then you would not know liberals.
Several months ago, Sarah Palin made a speech where she referred to an event that occurred 238 years ago. The event was the Boston Tea Party. And you heard the howls from the liberal pundits and wanna-bee intelligensia! She did not even know the Boston Tea Party was in 1776! Hahahaha
Problem was - Palin was right - and the ignoramuses on the left were the fools that did not know.
Now comes a new twist. One that I was not even aware of, and that is that Paul Revere did admonish the British when captured. And what she stated to a direct question by a ambush reporter, while very inelegant (but then we usually do not give flowery speeches when ambushed), was essentially true! yet, the lamestream media, and the liberal pundits, jumped on her initially to try to show the world what a fool she was! Problem is again, she was right, and they were wrong. They are the ignorant buffoons, and it seems like Palin knows more about history - especially that of Paul Revere - than the buffoons on the evening news in his home state!
I think Palin is doing this on purpose, She loves to tweak the noses of those who have a false sense of superiority. At least that would explain why her detractors look so bad. Of course it could be that her detractors do not need help to look bad. In our society where everyone has to "win", I guess the losers are the ones that do not realize they are not really smart - just ignorant jerks being shown up by a simple country woman.