The only thing I can complain about here is that this just proves that Obama is just another politician. Nothing different, fresh, new or better about him as some here believed when they voted for him. Just like everyone other politician, they always line themselves with people who have sketchy pasts, conflicting opinions and very little character.

If he had not promised, run on, and is still maintaining "transparency", I would tend to agree.  Most politicians drop the facade of their lies quickly.  That Obama has not indicates one of two things (or both) - he takes us for fools or he is a fool.

I have to admit, I am amazed he still trying to pull that wool over our eyes. The man is nothing if adamant about his "transparency". Perhaps he truly believes he is being transparent in accordance with his understanding of the word. Maybe?

There is not a word vile enough to use alone describing the man.  While an American was being killed on the border, he was in El Paso ridiculing citizens who want the border secured.  A moat with crocodiles ideed.

I fully support and encourage everything Obama is doing and hope he continues. It will ensure he doesn't get re-elected.

Doc, I read the link 2 times looking for the Hitler connection ... then I realized it was just your connection, go figure. CharlesM, would I be correct in assuming that you are referencing only half the spectrum here? Doc, I think the concept of "most politicians" is meaningless ... unless one is talking about the idiot’s party. BIG, personally I can think of a few people (some still festering in the USG) who could at least elevate Common's status a little above that of amoeba shit. Personally I know nothing about the idiot (rap???) and couldn't care less about his views or where he expresses them ... so why do you? Mason, right on the head! 1st amendments rights apply or they do not ... last I checked they haven't hit the chopping block yet. Imaging that, the White House did something stupid … sounds like business as usual to me. I am just of the opinion that this has been the norm for way to many years.

My reference was not to Common...I never heard of him before this little bruhaha started up...I was expressing my feelings about our current pres....what's the USG?

Big Fat Daddy – Sorry about that! I see you weren’t deceived by the “Hitler” reference, shame on me, hehehe. All I know about ‘Common” is that he is a Chicago rapper … and that’s more than I need or want to know. Taking your last comment into the proper light … I agree whole heartedly with your previous comment. USG is just my way of distinguishing between the US Government and the US People … whom I believe to be diametrically opposed to each other in most cases.

Mason, I hope your right. I'm cautiously pessimistic on this one. There was a wave of uninformed voters that handed him the WH in 2008. I don't believe many of them realize (or care) about their mistake (not that the alternative was much better). Yesterday I saw an Obama 2012 bumper sticker. The guy must install solar panels or get a gov check, as I don't know too many that are better off today than they were in 2008.

He is bound and determined to piss off every thinking American - just to prove his non-existent superiority.  if the press was honest, there would be more jokes about him than carter has liver pills.

At the rate he is going, there will be no one left to vote.

Well - I am glad you can make connections.  After all, the excuses are the same, and as stated, the only difference is in the timing - Obama was not born then.  But given his propensity to excuse the inexcusable (Wright, New Black Panthers, Gates, etc.), as long as Hitler did good (painted) and supported the right causes (Socialism and hatred of Jews), Obama would love him.  His actions are his own condemnation.

So why do I care?  Well, I guess most people do not care that this country has been set back 50 years in race relations due to his racist policies, or that he has turned the #1 Country economically into a 3rd rate power.  But I do.  I am just funny that way.

AND - Obama has one thing that no president has had to the degree he has before (Clinton had it somewhat, but they even got POed at him for lying about Monica).  And that is the press.  Too many people still think the News Anchors are god's gift to information.

But 47% of the populace does get some kind of check from the government.  Not all will vote for him, but too many will.

I assume you are discussing Mr. Doolittle here ... and I was talking about 'Common' , go figure. Come now, there is plenty of blame for everyone. Obama is an idiot IMO and does what they naturally do … act like an idiot. I guess I just don’t feign shock and outrage when they act as expected as some are prone. Comparing people to Hitler is ridiculous (I’m sure we all have a time or two though?) because you cannot, it is only argumentative and informative only of your own state of mind. So you contend that Obama the Magnificent through his genius has set race relations back 50 years to the 60’s, hum, not sure I can agree there but he has been anything but helpful. And he has … turned thus country into a 3rd rate economy. I see business as usual where the filthy rich just keep getting more filthy and the poor and middle class are still being taken to the bank, yep, business as usual. Who do you think is forcing world policy … Iraq? I wonder, did Bush do anything wrong?

Boobz - you need to work on your quoting.  However, if I read your post right, you do not seem to be able to understand a comparison.  The headline talked about Hitler and the article compared Common to Hitler (Godwin's law - I knew it going in).  As Obama and Hitler never lived in the same time period, one can only speculate given the performance of both Hilter and Obama.  Obama's love for those who hate is well documented and only being shown more often as the fawning press emboldens him to drop all pretenses of civility.

As to the unquoted paragraph, I can only say that you are either married to Col Klink (gene), or him in drag since you want to turn all discussions into something about Bush.  Go ahead.  But as Bush has nothing to do with this post, I will not debate that here or humor you with a reply on your attempted diversion.

I wonder, did Bush do anything wrong? ... that's what you gleaned from this, my oh my.

And that is your excuse for a flippant disregard of the arguments I made concerning your guesstaments and rhetoric, how typical of you. If you would stop all this nonsense about intelligence and ignorant and whore, which you handily use to dismiss someone and everything they say why … so you can impugn their character and slander their articles and posts? How childish is that? If I did not believe in something I wouldn’t write articles about it. If I did not believe what I wrote I wouldn’t write it. Why do you write here ... because you think you are wrong?

You have spent almost every comment you made concerning me, on telling me how stupid I am and how inaccurate everything is, etcetera. You dismiss virtually everything I say as poppycock … and this approach is supposed to help me change my opinions … how? And when your jibber jabber fails to sway me (go figure) … well I am just too pig headed and believe only what I believe (something wrong with that?). I assume you believe what you say … have I ever been able to change your mind on anything? But as the case with all bullies, you always attack others based on your own shortcomings.

Take “American Imperialism” as an example. You have told me elsewhere repeatedly that we aren’t? You make no argument at all and immediately launch into ‘kill mode’ and the conversation is over before it even gets started. http://www.americanempireproject.com/  has a lot of material on the subject, but then again, I guess you just ask the good old USG if they are guilty or not … me pigheaded, right.