Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Published on April 16, 2008 By Dr Guy In International

This is what we are supposed to look up to an emulate?

At least some here, and abroad are holding up this as an example of what America should be.  A land where you can be arrested, fined and jailed for what?

 

"I am fed up with being under the thumb of this population which is destroying us, destroying our country and imposing its acts,"

 

That is Bridget Bardot's crime.  Just stating an opinion.

Now we can argue that she is wrong, misguided, racists, xenophobic, and many other things.  She may be all those things or none of them.  But all she did was STATE that.  She did not burn crosses, over turn vehicles, strap bombs to children, or shoot at them.  She only stated that.

It is more telling for what the French are doing, than anything Bardot has said.  It is a clear indication that 1984 has taken control of Europe, and that newspeak is the only acceptable form of free speech.  Kind of like the joke in the old USSR:

American: We have free speech! We can say anything we want about our government!

Soviet: We have free speech too!  We can say anything we want about your government too!

It is sad that with the dawn of the 21st century, America is being told by friends abroad, and by liberals at home, that to be great we have to emulate this kind of censorship.  It is sadder still when their willing sycophants mouth those same sentiments, not understanding that even while they may agree with the keepers of newspeak today, the keepers of tomorrow may not be in synchronization with them.

Europe has taken a large step back from freedom.  And the sad part of it is, they don't even realize they have just abrogated one of the most precious rights they had.  All in the name of political correctness.

I for one do not want to see America goose stepping to this new world order.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Apr 21, 2008
Well, you see our enemy hates our freedom, right? Our strategy is to systematically eliminate our freedoms and thereby giving them nothing to hate.


Whoever it is from, it seems to be the order of battle today.
on Sep 07, 2008

Littleboy
I don't blame them, after all this is only to fight bad people that want to hurt the US citizens, why would they give a damn, right?

 

Sadly, this is a very naive belief that people hold. The UK is scaremongering about walking into a 'surveillance society' because of the amount of CCTV cameras everywhere. While I think that's a stupid statement to make in a nation like the UK, America needs to remember the amount of walls they've put up against a dictatorship. By allowing freedom of speech to be curbed, they are theoretically making it easier for a bad egg to take over.

Hitler never acting illegally when he took power in Germany.

The problem is, Hitler managed to take charge of the country by putting goons in charge of the jobs he wasn't allowed. The result? He uses the 'emergency powers' among others to take charge?

Sounds familiar?

This is one of the ways Roman emperors appeared out of the Roman republic - they used 'emergency powers' which allowed them virtual dictatorial powers for a year whenever 'danger' appeared to threaten the republic.

 

Freedom of speech isn't the same as 'emergency powers,' but it is one wall of many in America which protect against this. If you knock down one wall, what precedent halts the next wall being knocked down? And the next? And the next?

on Sep 07, 2008

*minus the ? after 'take charge'

on Sep 08, 2008

By allowing freedom of speech to be curbed, they are theoretically making it easier for a bad egg to take over.

Whatr those who advocate limits on speech are looking at is who the censors will be.  Today, they see the sensors as having the same ideals as they do themselves.  But that will not hold true for all time.  As you point out with the Roman emperors, they used a pretext to use existing laws to grab dictatorial power.  Free Speech is one of the walls we have to ensure that does not happen.

The very people calling Bush a Nazi and such are the very proof that he is not.  Their ability to make such statements shows that their statements are false.

2 Pages1 2