Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Published on June 6, 2006 By Dr Guy In Politics

If there was ever any doubt of why Tony Snow should have replaced Scott McClelland, those doubts should be put aside based upon the latest press conference.  The fossil, Helen Thomas, still working even after senility has set in, started the latest rounds of questions thusly:

Q Why did the President pick a man who is so contemptible of the public servants in Washington to be his Domestic Advisor -- saying, "People in Washington are morally repugnant, cheating, shifty human beings"? Why would he pick such a man to be a Domestic Advisor?

MR. SNOW: You meant contemptuous, as opposed to contemptible, I think.

Not to be upstaged (but just digging her own grave deeper), Helen continued the badgering, and Tony adroitly parried each of her offensive barbs.

Q Pure contempt.

MR. SNOW: Well, I'm not sure it's pure contempt. I know Karl Zinsmeister pretty well, and he is somebody who expresses himself with a certain amount of piquancy -- you're perhaps familiar with that, aren't you, Helen? And so, as a consequence, from time to time he's going to say -- he'll have some sharp elbows.

Q If this is his attitude toward public servants --

MR. SNOW: No, I don't think it's his attitude toward public servants -- it may have been toward the press. Just kidding. No, I -- look, if you look at the bulk of what Karl Zinsmeister has done at The American Enterprise and elsewhere, I think you're going to find somebody who's done some pretty meaty and interesting research on a variety of topics. The reason he's being brought in is that he's --

Q Do you agree with his assessment of Washington?

MR. SNOW: I'm not -- there's one sentence the guy wrote, and perhaps you may recall -- yes?

Q Arrogant, morally repugnant, cheating, shifty -- come on.

MR. SNOW: That's a lot in one sentence, isn't it? He just packed it right in.

Jim.

Q So what is the attitude toward --

MR. SNOW: The attitude is we're glad to have a guy on board who has breadth of knowledge, who has breadth of interest and of experience, and is going to bring --

Q No tolerance for other human beings.

MR. SNOW: Helen, tell you what, why don't you get to know Karl, because I think you're going to find out that to judge somebody --

Even after he had called on a second reporter she continued with her vitriol.  One wonders why they allow her to stay.  It is obvious she is senile, and even more obvious that she has only hate left in her repertoire.  Obvious to any rational person that is.


Comments
on Jun 06, 2006
I think you do her a great service by calling her senile. I don't think she is for a minute. I think she is basically a rotton person and a bad journalist who was kept on as a token of dissent for years because she is ineffectual.

Listen, if I wanted to prove that I had a balanced room to play to, I'd pick people like her or the Col, who no one can really take seriously because of their irrational, hateful biases. I mean, she called Jimmy Carter "our best past President."

In 2002 she said:

"I censored myself for 50 years when I was a reporter. Now I wake up and ask myself, 'Who do I hate today?'"


I think that sums it up nicely. It's good to keep her around, she gives America a good perspective on the value of the far Left.
on Jun 06, 2006

think you do her a great service by calling her senile. I don't think she is for a minute. I think she is basically a rotton person and a bad journalist who was kept on as a token of dissent for years because she is ineffectual.

I was just being Tony Snow about it.

But that quote explains a lot.  For if you hate yourself, how can you love anything?