Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Published on November 11, 2005 By Dr Guy In Politics

Angela Merkel will be the new leader of Germany (long or short).  She follows Margaret Thatcher, Gold Meir, Sirimavo Bandaranaike, Indira Ghandi, Elisabeth Domitien, Maria de Lourdes Pintasilgo, Mary Eugenia Charles, Gro Harlem Brundtland, Milka Planinc, Benazir Bhutto, Kazimiera Danutë Prunskienë, Khaleda Zia, Edith Cresson, Hanna Suchocka, Kim Campbell, Tansu Çiller, Sylvie Kinigi, Agathe Uwilingiyimana, Chandrika Kumaratunga, Reneta Indzhova, Claudette Werleigh, Sheikh Hasina Wajed, Janet Jagan, Jenny Shipley, Irena Degutienë,Nyam-Osoriyn Tuyaa, Helen Elizabeth Clark, Mame Madior Boye, Chang Sang,Maria das Neves Ceita Baptista de Sousa, Anneli Tuulikki Jäätteenmäki, Beatriz Merino Lucero, Luísa Dias Diogo, Radmila Sekerinska, Yuliya Tymoshenko, Maria do Carmo Silveira.

Sorry, I got carpal tunnel listing them.  All great women!  Not a single one with the name of Hillary.  And so what?




Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Nov 12, 2005

your sarcasm is quite unbecoming......and being anonymous is being a chicken.....squawk, squawk..

Actually, she/he has been engaging me on my Catholic Blog.  I already invited them to join.  Perhaps they will.

on Nov 12, 2005

And making taunting chicken noises is what? A good thing?

UB, we invite anons to join if they have something constructive to say.  Trudy saw that as a baiting, and so challenged.  After all, Joining costs nothing, except civility.

on Nov 12, 2005

if he wanted to post a "point-whoring" article, there's other JUsers that could give him lessons.....
and being as he has his own self-respect, he doesn't need yours!

I am honored!  Thank you!  I dont think Davad knows what PW is.  He is old, and yet really a newbie.

on Nov 12, 2005

Yeah, I guess I could make blog with a list of respected and adored male leaders, mention that none of them is named George, and then title it Hmmm.....George losing his appeal. And then, when people question the purpose of such a posting I could simply reply:

Close!  But you missed the point.  Try again.  And as I said before, you dont like it?  Dont read it.  He was not questioning the purpose.  He was slamming me.  Aint I so civil?

on Nov 12, 2005

and I "fer sure" understand about how names lose their appeal in certain decades, my sister's
name was popular in a 40's tune and that's what mom named for, a song.

These are women who have truly achieved.  Some on the coattails of their husbands, but most on their own.  I was only trying to point out that those who idolize Hillary Clinton, who has achieved nothing, are trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill literally.  Perhaps one day she will join this list.  Perhaps not.  But until and unless she does, I think it is very arrogant to put her at the head of it.

on Nov 12, 2005

Hillary made the mistake of not "resting her brand". Had she done a nice job in Congress and kept her domineering piehole out of the press for a couple of years she would have done herself a service. Instead she spent the last few years being the same kind of negative, whining foil she made her name as, and has kept why we despise her fresh in everyone's mind.

Baker gets the Cookie!  YES!  That is exactly it!  She pretended to belong to this list, when in fact she has yet to have anything in common with them!

These women are doers, not talkers.  She is the talker, not the doer. Sorry kingbee and davad.  you dont win anything.  You just figured it was a bash someone article.  You lose again!  But I guess you are use to it.

on Nov 12, 2005

it made about as much sense as being sarcastic, and being anonymous while slamming someone!

More.  But in this case, KFC was not slamming, but sarcastic?  Yep.  He/she does have a sense of humor!

on Nov 12, 2005
Conservatives are too smart for that


i dunno. it drew in an exceptionally intelligent & articulate conservative. good thing too. until bakerstreet showed up with some genuine content, there wasn't much here but a pandering title, a list of names and a concluding non-sequitur.
on Nov 12, 2005
Yup you're right again Doc....hoping you didn't think I was into the slamming....cuz that's not me...but sarcastic...yup that's me!! I admit it...I've got to work on that....and Trudy...you really got to work on that squeak...um squawk.
on Nov 13, 2005
wholly moses. potential candidates are atta disadvantage unless they bear the name of a previous leader?

brilliant analysis.


Yeah, I guess I could make blog with a list of respected and adored male leaders, mention that none of them is named George, and then title it Hmmm.....George losing his appeal. And then, when people question the purpose of such a posting I could simply reply:

Dont like it? Dont read it. I post what is of interest to me, not to you. If you cannot understand that, I am sorry for you.


That would be fine on "your" blog!
on Nov 13, 2005

dunno. it drew in an exceptionally intelligent & articulate conservative. good thing too. until bakerstreet showed up with some genuine content, there wasn't much here but a pandering title, a list of names and a concluding non-sequitur.

Guess you are not as intelligent as you thought then if you thought the last line was non-sequitar.

on Nov 13, 2005

Yup you're right again Doc....hoping you didn't think I was into the slamming....cuz that's not me...but sarcastic...yup that's me!! I admit it...I've got to work on that....and Trudy...you really got to work on that squeak...um squawk.

I still have not found the sarcasm tags!

Guess I will have to keep looking.

on Nov 13, 2005

That would be fine on "your" blog!

It's not mine?

on Nov 13, 2005
That would be fine on "your" blog!

It's not mine?


Sorry doc....I was replying to UBob.
on Nov 13, 2005

Sorry doc....I was replying to UBob.

I figured it.  But you had my last statement so I was kind of curious! NHNF

3 Pages1 2 3