Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Published on November 11, 2005 By Dr Guy In Politics

Someone has decided that blacks cannot be racists.  Why?  Because they are black silly!  They have decreed that a black liberal can denigrate anyone simply because they are a black liberal.  Can a Black conservative do that?  No!  that would be racist!

But I see a strange parallel forming here.  Remember Big Tom in GWTW?  He helped Miz Scarlet.  The Carpet baggers of the time called him an Uncle Tom.  Why?  Because he dared help his former master.

Yet today, we have toadies doing the exact same thing.  The liberals line up their toadies, often not bothering to even hide their strings (Hello Chuckie Schumer) and then give them marching orders.  To do what?

Be racists.  They are not speaking as black people.  they are simply mouthpieces for the liberal masssas!

And where is the outrage from the left?  The pretend defenders of civil rights (which they voted against)?  Where is the denunciation of the bigots who have no tolerance for those of the same or different skin color that do not agree with them in lockstep?

Do I hear a pin drop?

It is no wonder that the Aryan Nation feels more acclimated with the left than the right.  The right has rejected that screed and denounced it!  Yet the left embraces it.  Why?  It advances their cause.  Keeping the blacks in line is more important to them than advancing Blacks to a status of equality.

"OK, Uncle Tom. Go blast that man for speaking heresy, and we will give you the scraps from our lilly white table."

Thank you Dean, Byrd and the Maryland leadership for saying what the non-racist population of the US already feared, and now know.

Racism cannot be defeated until we get rid of the new masters on liberal intolerance.


Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Nov 12, 2005

first of all, your reference is about as bizarre as the rest of your post. long before 'gone with the wind' was even high concept, uncle tom was the title character in harriet beecher stowe's famous anti-slavery novel 'uncle tom's cabin'.

I never said GWTW created the term.  Just used it.

on Nov 12, 2005

why are you condemning those are calling him on that choice?

I have not condemned them for calling him on that choice.  SHow me where I did.  Please.

on Nov 12, 2005

sorry for taking advantage of your lack of common sense a second time on this same issue, but what can i say? i'm unable to stop myself from pointing out once more it's the governor of maryland who has something major in common with the aryan nation: all-white clubhouses.

No, your ignorance is in not being able to read and comment intelligently on an article.  Since I neither condoned or condemned or even mentioned the Governor of Maryland since he is not the one running around spouting racist slogans.  Try commenting on what I write, not what you want me to write.

on Nov 12, 2005

that you are able to convince yourself blacks actualy do such things is quite a window into your soul

And your misreading of the article and defense of the racism is a window into yours.  I never said any of that.  I implied that is what the liberal leadership thinks (altho I did not overtly state it).  Ergo, the fact you raised your hackles indicates that you also think they are somewhat like that (liberal leadership) and are not again trying to defend the indefensible.

on Nov 12, 2005

Racism cannot be defeated until the right stops lumping shiftless welfare recipents with black fatherless children, along with shortchanging Title I for the education of the disadvantaged.

I would disagree that the right is doing that, and yes, it has to be stopped regardless of who is doing it. But I dont see Title I (Or Chapter II) being an issue as education is a local issue that must be addressed by communities, not the feds that just add exorbitant overhead to a slumbering bureaucracy.

on Nov 12, 2005
Once again you attempt to play games instead saying anything of substenance. You throw out inflammatory accusations and then when you get called on them, you play games. You talk of other people who don't know how to have a debate, but you yourself doesn't have a clue. In the future I will just point out your lies, but will attempt not to respond to your point whoring articles. Have a miserable life douchebag. You will note that that is the first time I've called you a name like that, but I just couldn't help myself any more. I have to call them like I see them.
on Nov 12, 2005

here's an easy way to differentiate racists from non-focused hateful people

And therein lies the fallacy of your hyporcisy.  For this is not 'non-focused' hateful people.  They are focused on destroying any black that is not a cookie cutter copy of themselves.  I will not call you a crank, because your attitude is why we have a problem with racism in America.  Once you take your blinders off, you may start to help correct the situation, instead of being part of the problem.

on Nov 12, 2005
oops, won't let me edit...I meant to say substance.
on Nov 12, 2005
davad70


Thanks to idiots like yourself, we have the delete and blacklist options.
on Nov 12, 2005

Once again you attempt to play games instead saying anything of substenance. You throw out inflammatory accusations and then when you get called on them, you play games.

No, I threw out exactly what I meant and stated.  And it is a fact.  How are you calling me on the facts?  Do you wish to show me where I am wrong?  no, you just use your spittle to state your opinion.  Your Opinion is fine, but like poop chutes, we all have them.  Do you want to debate the facts?  Please present your own facts on topic.  I dont need to be told that David Duke is a racist.  That is not the subject of this article and he has already been ostracized by the Republicans.

This is how the liberals refuse to do the same on their racists.  can you refute my facts?  Give me where any leading liberal has come out and said the racism being displayed in Maryland is bad?  Show me where Bill clinton, Ted kennedy or John Kerry called Ted Rall onto the carpet?

SHow me. Or STFU

on Nov 12, 2005

but will attempt not to respond to your point whoring articles. Have a miserable life douchebag.

No, actually the second.  And I dont do point whoring Articles.  Please point one out to me.  You cant.  because you are the idiot.  You are so blinded by obedience to your masters, you never question them and call them out.  No one forced you here.  No one made you respond.  And you have yet to present a single fact to refute the facts used here (to bolster my opinion).  I can debate all night long, but you cant seem to grasp that in debating, Opinions are not facts.

on Nov 12, 2005

Thanks to idiots like yourself, we have the delete and blacklist options.

I will let his statements stand.  As a testament to the jerk he is.

on Nov 12, 2005

Uh, excuse me? WHo filibustered the Civil rights bill? I will give you a clue. His nickname is sheets.

BTW: Davad, you never answered my FACTS.  care to try?

on Nov 12, 2005
As a testament to the jerk he is.


and that he is!
on Nov 12, 2005

and that he is!

Shalom!  We miss you around here.

3 Pages1 2 3