It Had to be the French

Published on October 26, 2005 By Dr Guy In Politics

There has been a lot of controversy about Iraq trying to obtain Yellow Cake Uranium during Saddam's last year in power. Altho there is no evidence that he was, there were documents that purported to show he was. And now the truth comes out. It appears that the French forged the Documents!

Why? To embarrass the English and French and prevent them from going to war against Saddam!

OK, pupils, can anyone tell me what happened? You, there in the third row. yes?

That is right! The US and Great Britain used that (along with other justifications) to depose Saddam? So how effective were the French?

Well, if they had done nothing, the chances are good that Saddam would still be sipping Merlot with Chirac. So by trying something deceitful and sneaky, they accomplished the exact opposite of what they wanted!

It had to be the French! No one else is that inept.

Comments (Page 2)

latour999

on Oct 27, 2005

No thoughts, latour, on the alleged reasons behind the French policy? No attempt to defend the French policy? No explanation of how the French policy is a righteous policy, and how this document-forging thing, ugly as it is, is a necessary part of that policy? No counter-examples? Nothing at all to convince the rest of us that the French government isn't really as stupid and evil as this story makes them seem?

I don't want you to run in and defend the document-forging. I'm just wondering if you'll run in and explain why it's either not as bad as it looks, in support of a good cause, misrepresentedm by the media, or outweighed by good deeds.

JU is predominantly conservative, but that doesn't seem to stop the resident liberals from posting their own partisan articles all the time. It just seems to stop them from putting up a partisan defense against conservative articles.

It seems like you and the other liberals here have no problem arguing that the Bush policies and actions are indefensible, even though the rest of us don't really shy away from defending them. But you seem to have a lot tougher time coming to the defense of opposition-faction policies.

No, it is not righteous policy, no it is not necessary, and yes, those who forged the documents are really as stupid and evil as they seem. And yes, it is as bad as it looks.

And if I argue that lying about the WMDs is indefinsible, then why do I have to defend forging documents about WMDs? And why is it that just because I critize Bush, I automatically have to like everyone that opposes them? Why do I have to fall into one of two holes on everything?

And why is it that I have to like everyone who doesn't like Bush? I mean, Kerry is pretty much just as bad in my books.

Dr Guy

on Oct 27, 2005

Nothing at all to convince the rest of us that the French government isn't really as stupid and evil as this story makes them seem?

I dont think any but the most extreme lefties would take on the impossible task!

Dr Guy

on Oct 27, 2005

yes, those who forged the documents are really as stupid and evil as they seem. And yes, it is as bad as it looks.

You see? We can agree on somethings!

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!