Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Tough call
Published on August 10, 2005 By Dr Guy In Politics

In their extreme hatred of anything Bush, NARAL has decided to run an ad that is not only a bald face lie, but is libelous as well.  In it, they accuse John Roberts of not only defending an Abortion Clinic Bomber, but in supporting the violence!

The only grain of truth to that was 7 years before the jerk bombed the clinic, Roberts did file a brioef supporting his cause in another case (one eventually upheld by the SCOTUS 6-3).

Instead, this ad treats us to not even innuendo of impropriety, but just a outright lie!  Roberts never supported the bomber in his bombing charge, nor did he ever condone abortion clinic bombing.

But if you watch the NARAL ad, that is all you can conclude. 

And how many people on the left have spoken out against this outright lie?  If you guessed one, you are too high!  Yet a year ago, when the Swift Boat vets were running ads that were not lies, the MSM told conservatives they must speak out against the ads!

Where is the MSM now?  Where are the loony loopy luddite liberals now?  No one is denouncing this ad.

And you thought NARAL was working for you?  No, they are just working for their own brand of despotism and corruption.

What a bunch of outright, unquestioned jackasses!  I hope that at least the Pro Choicers here will denounce those dunces.


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Aug 10, 2005
Does that mean when the ACLU represents the KKK or neo-nazis they support racism? Gosh, does that mean when Libs support the rights of terrorists to due process they support terrorism?

I don't think the Left wants to start keeping that kind of tally.
on Aug 10, 2005

Gosh, does that mean when Libs support the rights of terrorists to due process they support terrorism?

I dont know about that one.

But Roberts was not even defending the guy in the first place, only saying that they were using the wrong statute!

Roberts argued that abortion clinics who brought the suit had no right use an 1871 federal anti-discrimination statute against anti-abortion protesters who tried to blockade clinics. Eventually a 6-3 majority of the Supreme Court agreed, too. Roberts argued that blockades were already illegal under state law.

on Aug 10, 2005
The fact is, though, the ACLU actively defends the rights of groups like the KKK all the time. If Roberts was supposedly promoting the beliefs of the protesters, does that mean the ACLU promotes the beliefs of the KKK?

This is a sad attempt that could easily be turned back on the Left.
on Aug 10, 2005
Since when did lies stop any political party from claiming it's the truth?
on Aug 11, 2005
Any television station that airs these ads should be sued for slander and defamation of character. Just goes to show how slimy these folks can be.


That's CNN for ya.
on Aug 11, 2005

The fact is, though, the ACLU actively defends the rights of groups like the KKK all the time. If Roberts was supposedly promoting the beliefs of the protesters, does that mean the ACLU promotes the beliefs of the KKK?

You should go work for CNN.  They need clarity of thought like that.

on Aug 11, 2005

Any television station that airs these ads should be sued for slander and defamation of character. Just goes to show how slimy these folks can be.

I hope CNN is!  They have already admitted it was 'false'.  Which means it is beyond misleading.

Where are all the liberals on this BTW?

on Aug 11, 2005

Since when did lies stop any political party from claiming it's the truth?

This is not a political party, but a supposed group promoting a choice.  But their choice is abortion only.

on Aug 11, 2005

That's CNN for ya.

Amen.

on Aug 11, 2005

From what I remember, all Roberts has been saying is that it should be up to the states to determine how to policy anti-abortion demonstrations.  He was saying that anything like that (and abortion in general) should be left up to the people to decide by vote.   

I do believe that we try to have too many federal laws.  We also allow the courts to make new laws (which is how RvW even came into being).  I have no problem with anyone who says "leave it to the states".  Don't like a certain states laws? Simply don't live there.....of course, that might be too logical of an approach.....

on Aug 11, 2005
do believe that we try to have too many federal laws. We also allow the courts to make new laws (which is how RvW even came into being). I have no problem with anyone who says "leave it to the states". Don't like a certain states laws? Simply don't live there.....of course, that might be too logical of an approach.....


Actually, he was not even saying that in this instance. he was saying the laws of the states in this case (not the abortion bombing one, but the blockading of the sites) took precidence over Federal laws and should be upheld. And the SCOTUS agreed with him 6-3.

He never defended bombing or the bomber. Yet NARAL wants us to believe so! Pathetic.
on Aug 11, 2005
TV told me that if my man wears Axe body spray we'll have passionate sex with my back against the steering wheel of a car.

TV lies.
on Aug 12, 2005
They blinked, though they don't really admit to their garbage, they just regret that it was "misconstrued" and claim they are moving it because it distracts from the real issue.

Me, I think it drew too much attention to the real issue, how desperate they are to vilify and bar anyone pro-life from the Supreme Court...
on Aug 12, 2005

TV told me that if my man wears Axe body spray we'll have passionate sex with my back against the steering wheel of a car.

TV lies.

No, actually that one is true!  And this is a testimonial!

on Aug 12, 2005

They blinked

Watch my spitfire.

2 Pages1 2