Is the NY Times into Pedophilia?

Something is not right

Published on August 5, 2005 By Dr Guy In Current Events

The NY Times has decided that the investigation of John Roberts' Children, not John Roberts is SOP. Excuse me? These kids are 4 and 5 years old! What do they have to do with the qualification of John Roberts to the Supreme court? What business is it of the NY Times? Please, someone show me in the constitution where it says that a nominee to the Supreme court must be investigated by the NY Times, or any member of the media?

And while you are at it, show me where it says a nominee's children should also be investigated?

No, this lame attempt at a smear by the old grey lady is nothing less than rampant pedophilia. What the hell do they think they are going to find? That the children hate liver and fuss when made to go to bed?

STOP THE PRESSES

This is just perversion masquerading as news, and not even a good news story at that. I think it is high time that he editors and the reporters of the NY Times be investigated for pedophilia and other perversions. It is growing readily apparent that they don't know how to report the news any longer, just to make it.

And since there is no scandal going on right now, they are going to create their own.

Headlines: Times reporters get nude baby pictures of Roberts' children!

What a bunch of sick animals the times have become.

Comments (Page 3)

kingbee

on Aug 06, 2005

Prove it first. WHy should I defend or even respond to unfounded allegations?

prove it happened? notta problem. there's no question someone tried to use that little girl to hurt mccain.

if you don't believe it now, you wont believe it when i document it. more to the point, you've just made it very obvious your outrage has little to do with adults mixing kids up in their battles...unless you perceive the kids to be on your side.

drmiler

on Aug 09, 2005

No law needs to give the NYTimes the power to investigate--it's what journalist do, and I am sure the stuff they are getting their hands on are a matter of public record.

Yes they do and adoptions are NOT public record. Just try to access someones adoption record and see what kind of stone wall you hit!

drmiler

on Aug 09, 2005

Actually, no. They are trying to open court sealed records

And I would imagine they are going about it legally? As in a judge will have to decide? What's the big deal?

There is no "legally" about it. Those records are sealed and there is NO reason at all to look into them! If he "obtained" the children illegally (black market) then there would be no records would there? Last I knew, people who are into the black market frown on legal records.

Dr Guy

on Aug 09, 2005

if you don't believe it now, you wont believe it when i document it. more to the point, you've just made it very obvious your outrage has little to do with adults mixing kids up in their battles...unless you perceive the kids to be on your side.

Nice try at deflection. Want to answer the point or just throw out more unfounded allegations?

Dr Guy

on Aug 09, 2005

Yes they do and adoptions are NOT public record. Just try to access someones adoption record and see what kind of stone wall you hit!

Ah, but the times is above the law. Have we not seen that with the Miller case? Laws are for the unwashed rabble, not the old grey lady herself.

Dr Guy

on Aug 09, 2005

The press has already opened sealed records. Remember Congressman Ryan?

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!