Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Even Monkeys get it right 50% of the time
Published on July 26, 2005 By Dr Guy In Politics

The Democrat Leadership Council was created in response to the disasters of the 80 and 84 elections to drag the democrat party back towards the center.  In it, it was lead by conservative governors, mostly from the south.  Indeed it was an awakening of the democrats that they could not neglect the south and win the Presidency.  And it worked.  Clinton won on a left center (moderately liberal) platform in 92.

Clinton was a leader in the DLC, and to this day probably plays an important part.  Bill that is.  Now the DLC has basically thrown in their hats to the NE liberal establishment.  They have gone over to the NE liberal side of the party.  How?  By allowing Clinton to write the agenda for the group!

But, but, but you say!  Was he not the prime example of the fact that it worked?  Wrong Clinton!  They have asked Hillary, by far one of the most shrillest and left members of the democrats (regardless of what you think she is becoming), and a perfect fit for the NE Liberal ilk of the likes of Kennedy, Kerry, Leahy and Durbin.  And the DLC whose mission was to win elections has just been emasculated.

Kind of funny that the member of the democrat party with the most balls is none other than the Royal Queen herself.  And even Clinton (bill this time) had to distance himself from her left wing policies and some of her nominations during his term as President.

The DLC appears to be a one trick pony.  They got Clinton elected, but now that the loony left part of the party is running the show, their run is over.  A shame really.  They were kind of the last hope for a return to a 2 party system, instead of one party and a bunch of raving lunatics.


Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Nov 09, 2005

just sittin here watchin the returns from the governor's race in va.

can i offer you a slice of pie, doc? take your choice: crow or humble

First, I made no predictions.  So no pie is in order.  Second, please check out the winner of the Gubernatorial race in Virginia since 1977.  Then you tell me who I bet on (I did not say voted for).

Would you like mint jelly with your crow?

on Nov 09, 2005

no pie? perhaps i should go back and revive all the 'why democrats will never win another election' articles you've written?

Sure!  Please do!  I was talking National, not state.  Go right ahead!  I would never be so stupid as to say that democrats would never win local races, or even some Senate and house races.  And when you get those statistics, check out my latest for a serving of Crow ala beeswax.

on Nov 09, 2005
Do you get points for each of these posts you make Dr. Guy? No wonder you're #1 !

You are the man!!
on Nov 10, 2005

Do you get points for each of these posts you make Dr. Guy? No wonder you're #1 !

You are the man!!

This one is kind of old.  Kingbee resurrected it.

on Nov 10, 2005
I was just referring to how many consecutive individual posts you made instead of combining them all into one.
on Nov 10, 2005
This one is kind of old. Kingbee resurrected it.


the hell i did. yall should be blaming singrdave, mm & egnimatic for that.
on Nov 10, 2005
Try AG for starters. Janet Reno was his (or actually her) third choice


you'll have to cite the law by which the first lady is either permitted submit a nominee or forbidden to proffer her husband advice (or answers, ala nancy...or opinions ala barbara & betty).

next you'll be trying to claim laura pushed george into politics--as if anyone with his long personal history of civic service and barely controllable political ambition would need any additional motivation.
on Nov 10, 2005
How about one centered to the near left, and one centered to the near right?


Boring.
on Nov 10, 2005

I was just referring to how many consecutive individual posts you made instead of combining them all into one.

Maybe because they were made on different days?  Or dealing with different subjects?

on Nov 10, 2005

the hell i did. yall should be blaming singrdave, mm & egnimatic for that.

I did not get a notification until you popped into gloat.  So if you had not, I would never have noted their comments.  JU Email is not foolproof apparently.

on Nov 10, 2005

you'll have to cite the law by which the first lady is either permitted submit a nominee or forbidden to proffer her husband advice (or answers, ala nancy...or opinions ala barbara & betty).

I dont beleive any one was talking legalities here.  You asked, I gave you an example.  If you wanted to know what illegality Hillary committed while in the white house, try Vince Foster.  But I understand that dead men tell no tales however.

on Nov 10, 2005

How about one centered to the near left, and one centered to the near right?


Boring.

Well, then it will not be boring for the foreseeable future I guess!

on Nov 10, 2005
If you wanted to know what illegality Hillary committed while in the white house, try Vince Foster. But I understand that dead men tell no tales however.


And you guys calls US kooks????

on Nov 10, 2005
Davad: When stymied conjure up the dead! Lefties are not permitted to call righties names.
on Nov 11, 2005
I dont beleive any one was talking legalities here


you suggested hillary clinton nominated janet reno to be attorney general. while i don't doubt for a second you believe that to be the case, i was pointing out the fact (and, yes, it is a fact) she couldn't have done so legally.

what vince foster has to do with the discussion to that point is inexplicable without subjecting you to an mri.
3 Pages1 2 3