Liberal or conservative, those who perpetrate violence are on the fringe. Civilization and freedom are tolerant of differing viewpoints. A closed mind never reaches its potential.

As someone who "reads" that particular paper "quite" regularly I can say WITH authority....YES it spews CRAP! And quite regularly too.

And yet you keep reading...its a fascinating exercise in massochism, isn't it?

Much as I agree that the Socialists try to stop anti-Socialist views with vilification, abuse, thuggery and loud mouths, the same can also be said about the ultra-Conservatives. When both sides come up against a viewpoint they do not like, their rhetoric and actions become vicious. The Fox report demonstrates a Socialist attitude. The vicious vilification of Michael Schiavo and Judge Greer demonstate the other end of the spectrum.

There is nothing right wing about the vilification of Michael Schiavo and Judge Greer.  It transcends a political ideology and goes to People for the Ethical threatment of People. period.

altho i generally like pat buchanan, it's really a shame someone with a camera didnt follow him home so we could see what his hair looks like after it's been washed and before he puts his regular brand of salad dressing on it. as far as the presidential discussion groups go, dog bites man aint news. if there were anyone in attendance but shills, THAT would be a story. oh...and the secret service guy was very likely agent jeff gannon.

LOL and LOL

Liberal or conservative, those who perpetrate violence are on the fringe. Civilization and freedom are tolerant of differing viewpoints. A closed mind never reaches its potential.

A simpler truth was never spoken.

"...conservative, those who perpetrate violence are on the fringe."

I could not differ with you more. Everyday the 'man' (the State), needlessly perpetuates violence upon its citizens. Everyday the 'man' falsely deprives citizens of their liberty; everyday the 'man' falsely incarcerates citizens; everyday the 'man' beats up black, brown, yellow, and red people, for no reason than being a minority. The ‘man’ brutally beats down minorities with his goon stick; everyday the ‘man’ sadistically sprays peeper gas into the faces of innocent minorities; every day the man unleashes his attack Shepard to maul minorities; everyday the black robe monster, who by definition disregard biblical admonitions against judging another, announces the ‘man’s’ judgment.

The 'man' executes innocent citizens; what's worse the man knows that his system is flawed; that it routinely results in executions of innocent citizens; but the 'man' comes up with a song and dance to rationalize, justify, a system that executes the innocent. Once one accepts that the system executes innocent people, then with one's next breath one ought to decry its end. Call it trolling, but you and I both know that the man is the most violent SOB out there. Beware of Big Brother. He's watching.

The 'man' executes innocent citizens; what's worse the man knows that his system is flawed; that it routinely results in executions of innocent citizens; but the 'man' comes up with a song and dance to rationalize, justify, a system that executes the innocent. Once one accepts that the system executes innocent people, then with one's next breath one ought to decry its end. Call it trolling, but you and I both know that the man is the most violent SOB out there. Beware of Big Brother. He's watching.

You are too young to have lived in the 70s, but what you describe is exactly what was rhetorically stated back then.  And was just as wrong as the ones doing all of that were not 'whitey', but the ones raging against 'whitey'.

You are too ignorant to see your own contradictions and stupidity.  You have no facts, no reasoning and no rationale.  You have only hate, and that will not get you far.  It would be best for you to learn and understand those you hate.  At the very least, you could then mount an intelligence response.  At the best, you would then understand your own hatred and bigottry and perhaps find ways to combat your own prejudice.

Somehow I doubt either will occur.

Hey Tarantula, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean everyone isn't out to get ya. They are. Watch your back.

LOL!

"You are too young to have lived in the 70s, but what you describe is exactly what was rhetorically stated back then. And was just as wrong as the ones doing all of that were not 'whitey', but the ones raging against 'whitey'.

You are too ignorant to see your own contradictions and stupidity. You have no facts, no reasoning and no rationale. You have only hate, and that will not get you far. It would be best for you to learn and understand those you hate. At the very least, you could then mount an intelligence response. At the best, you would then understand your own hatred and bigottry and perhaps find ways to combat your own prejudice.

Somehow I doubt either will occur."

In the future, be less abstract, as this drivel considerably lacks specificity.

You disparage me for contradictions and stupidity, for lacking facts and reasoning, without specifying precisely where I commit these transgressions. It is a fact that the 'man' executes innocent people, and cynically dismisses same as the cost of doing business, so to speak. This is simply disgraceful; yet curiously you resort to name calling when the fact the 'man' puts innocent citizens to death stubbornly persists; it will not go away, unless we rail against the machine. Wouldn't you agree, Dr. Guy? What I do is necessary.

Reply By: little_whip Posted: Sunday, April 03, 2005
"Hey Tarantula, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean everyone isn't out to get ya. They are. Watch your back."

Why would I bother watching my back when that way might result in missing out on a good wiping?

Gotta run, I think someone's here.

Cheers

I'm back; I must have been hearing things.

Cheers

As someone who "reads" that particular paper "quite" regularly I can say WITH authority....YES it spews CRAP! And quite regularly too. And yet you keep reading...its a fascinating exercise in massochism, isn't it?

First rule of war.....Know thine enemy!

"First rule of war.....Know thine enemy!"

Why is crusty old' chum such as yourself so hell bent on pointing a gun at a defenseless opponent; this terrifying attitude that takes pleasure in bullying is reprehensible, to say the least; moreover, I do not see you placing yourself in harms way. Tell us some brave tale in which you were shot at (for your sake but not ours, hopefully they missed), or stop preaching for more and more war. War is a widow maker, an orphan maker, etc. If there is a devil, Dr. Miller, he dwells in war. So why give him a home? I say stop the incessant war mongering now!

First rule of war.....Know thine enemy!" Why is crusty old' chum such as yourself so hell bent on pointing a gun at a defenseless opponent; this terrifying attitude that takes pleasure in bullying is reprehensible, to say the least; moreover, I do not see you placing yourself in harms way. Tell us some brave tale in which you were shot at (for your sake but not ours, hopefully they missed), or stop preaching for more and more war. War is a widow maker, an orphan maker, etc. If there is a devil, Dr. Miller, he dwells in war. So why give him a home? I say stop the incessant war mongering now!

First off you should shut your IGNORANT hole! I really don't think you would know your butt from a hole in the ground. If I'm pointing a "firearm" at someone you can be god-damned sure they are NOT innocent! And just an FYI I've already been in "harms way". Can you truthfully say the same? I've said this before and I guess I need to say it again. The ONLY crust around here is around your mouth and BOTH of the southern most exits of your body.

And here we have another anonymous user, jumping bravely up to take potshots at the bad ol' conservatives. Why is it that only the mouthiest, weirdest libs ever use anon status, and not us?

What the hell do you know about "the man"? Which of The Weathermen are you?
As to violence against minorities, the FBI compiled a list of violent crimes, and found that black-on-white crime was the more common. Damn it, I had the link, but I lost it. We're talking a vast difference in numbers here.