Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
You would think they would learn
Published on January 25, 2005 By Dr Guy In Politics

When I first read this story, I could not believe it.  Yet there it is in black and white.  The Democrats want to repeal the 22nd amendment so that Slick Willy can run again!

What is it that causes these idiots to want to self destruct?  During Clintons 8 years (he never did get over 50% of the vote, BTW), they lost the house, they lost the senate.  They also lost a majority of Governorships and saw the Republicans draw even in state legislators!  And due to his 'the meaning of is is' lies, they lost the presidency in 2000.

And they want to run this guy again? 

Most sane people, when they run into a brick wall, do not continue to bang their head against it trying to get through.  The go over or around it, but they dont try suicide by stupidity.

Not these democrats!  They want their party to be shot down to a permanent minority party!  They cant get it out of their head that the only reason Clinton was Elected was - 1 Ross Perot, and 2, A weak Republican in 96.

If this whole story was not so stupid, I would laugh.  But I dont look forward to an America domionated by one party for the next 40 years.  I really wish the clowns who selected these leaders of the democrats to toss them out on their ass.  But when you have doofooses like Boxer, McDermott, Clinton and Kerry running the party into the ground, I dont see it happening.  They will continue to elect loony loopy luddites to their leadership, and be condemned to minority status for the foreseeable future.

Pity the people that vote for them, and their idiocy.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jan 25, 2005
It's no more outrageous than the Republicans trying to get the constitution changed to run Arnie, in my opinion......
on Jan 25, 2005

It's no more outrageous than the Republicans trying to get the constitution changed to run Arnie, in my opinion......


I did not say it was outrageous, only that the Democrats must be Desperate to want to run Mr Cigar again.


Frankly, I dont want to change the constitution for either of them.  I think Arnie would be a good president, but thems the rules.

on Jan 25, 2005
QUOTE: Most sane people, when they run into a brick wall, do not continue to bang their head against it trying to get through. The go over or around it, but they dont try suicide by stupidity.

Is this a critique of Bush's Iraq Policy?
on Jan 25, 2005
QUOTE: Most sane people, when they run into a brick wall, do not continue to bang their head against it trying to get through. The go over or around it, but they dont try suicide by stupidity.

Is this a critique of Bush's Iraq Policy?
on Jan 25, 2005
Dr Rice tapdanced around almost every question asked by a dem. Dubya hasn't made ONE single statement about the lack of WMD's to the american public. So you are saying it's ok for the right to disregard an issue but if the dems do it they are being deceitful.

That's the prroblem. What's good for the goose isn't good for the gander...Hypocricy at it's finest...That's the GOP!
on Jan 25, 2005

Dr Rice tapdanced around almost every question asked by a dem. Dubya hasn't made ONE single statement about the lack of WMD's to the american public. So you are saying it's ok for the right to disregard an issue but if the dems do it they are being deceitful.

I did not say anything about a Dem ignoring an issue.  I dont see it as an issue, just a problem.  They are famous for that.  And I dont recall any non-answers by Dr. Rice.  She seemed to nail each and every one of them.

And the report on the WMDs said it all.  Why pollute the airwaves with redundancy?

on Jan 25, 2005

Reply #6 By: thatoneguyinslc - 1/25/2005 1:20:21 PM
The democratic party is not looking to appeal the 22nd amendment. And it is highly unlikely that Bubba would even consider running again.

Guy, i would suggest maybe referencing this with a real news organization instead of using newsmax.com as your only source. They have very little credibility across the board when it comes to matters of the DNC.


Oh but they have credibility everywhere else? How utterly convienant for you.
2 Pages1 2