Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Published on December 21, 2008 By Dr Guy In Politics

With the US struggling with a recession, large companies going belly up, bailouts totalling trillions of dollars, what is congress doing in all this?  HOw are they helping the economy?

By using the Trickle down theory apparently.  They just voted themselves a $4,700 pay raise!  So I guess they think they themselves are going to spend the economy out of this recession?

When they sit an lecture CEOs on their salary and bonuses, when they sit and condemn extravagant salaries, what right do they have to "VOTE" themselves one?  The truth is that not a single CEO of a public corporation sets their salary.  The Board of Directors do.  Yet congress, who knows less, does less, and accomplishes nothing, has that power.

And they will soon be running many major corporations.  And paying their cronies millions (Franklin Raines anyone?) to run them into the ground further so that they can then bail them out with YOUR money to waste again.

There is no wonder congress has only a 9% approval rating.  One wonders how the US has almost 10% of the population as vegetables to approve of those clowns.

So much for Pelosi and Reid and their "ethical" government.  Talk about oxymoron.


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 24, 2008

Look I hate the fact they are getting a raise. Who here can have such a bad aprovail rating yet get a raise... the last time I checked if i did a bad job at my job i didnt get a raise .... so why should they? o thats right....

on Dec 24, 2008

I have always felt that their raises should be a matter of vote by the citizenry. As lousy a job as they are doing I think their pay should be cut not raised. I'd love to see every single one of them voted out of office en masse.

on Dec 24, 2008

I'd love to see every single one of them voted out of office en masse.

yes siree......let's take a vote! 

on Dec 24, 2008

MasonM
I have always felt that their raises should be a matter of vote by the citizenry. As lousy a job as they are doing I think their pay should be cut not raised. I'd love to see every single one of them voted out of office en masse.

 

well we may see a change in the near future when the elections come up.. i can see it if BO fails and the Congress and such dont get the act together we could see another swing again.... very soon...people are really starting to feel the pinch and its only gonna hurt more the longer this mess keeps going

on Jan 05, 2009

Although I got the feeling that the write-in votes were ignored for the most part because as far as I'm aware they are still reporting that all unopposed candidates received 100% of the votes, which is simply impossible (assuming anyone counted my e-ballot).

I wonder about that as well.  I know that it serves no purpose in the grand scheme of things to count absentee and other non-standard votes if the election is not close.  But do they?  If the guy is going to win by a million, or 900,000, he still wins.  It is one of the reasons I have not voted absentee yet.  I want to keep the illusion my vote is being counted.

on Jan 05, 2009

o thats right....

Yea, kind of like the condescending pukes they are "do as I say, not as I do".

on Jan 05, 2009

I think their pay should be cut not raised.

WHile I dont see them getting voted out en masse, I think tying their raise to a vote is a great idea.  Time to tell the clowns to do their job or get out of town.

on Jan 05, 2009

yes siree......let's take a vote!

If all 435 were voted on by all people, they would be.  But everyone has their pets.  Look at Murtha, and Frank!  A cancer on the nation, yet they still win each year.

on Jan 05, 2009

we could see another swing again.... very soon

It could be 2 years, but more likely 4 if then.  But a change will occur.  But then we will have the same thing.  Repubs acting like democrats.

on Jan 05, 2009

I wonder about that as well. I know that it serves no purpose in the grand scheme of things to count absentee and other non-standard votes if the election is not close. But do they? If the guy is going to win by a million, or 900,000, he still wins. It is one of the reasons I have not voted absentee yet. I want to keep the illusion my vote is being counted.

What I meant by e-voting was that I used the electronic voting booth at my precinct instead of the scantron-like paper ballot.  I saw the vote recorded on the paper tape that was scrolling next to the screen but I always wonder if that vote actually gets counted.

on Jan 05, 2009

I saw the vote recorded on the paper tape that was scrolling next to the screen but I always wonder if that vote actually gets counted.

I understood that.  Still, instead of a machine count, those votes, like Absentee ballots, have to be hand recorded.  So if the election is not even close, do they even try?  it is a lot of work for basically a moot point.

2 Pages1 2