I am saddened, but not surprised. An old dog does not learn new tricks.

And your point is? As you are new, you have the right to say anything you want. On your blog. But making pointless statements and name calling will not be tolerated until you have earned that right with reasoned arguments and logic.

You have been warned.

Oh, and this is not about Bush. Since this is also not about Kerry, Clinton or Obama, any future off topic references will be deleted.

Very good. This should have been your first post, not your second. But to answer your question, this is just the latest in a long list of similar actions (and perhaps the worst example) of the left using their fists instead of words to make a point. You can either read earlier blogs of mine, google it, or do your own research. As this was about the latest (when written) example, I did not feel the need or necessity to recount every incident that supports the title. Please feel free to do so yourself.



We manufactured this liberal neanderthal's actions? Come on, show at least the semblance of sanity here.



It does you no good to spout talking points. it is evident you have no desire to find out why someone on the right beleives as they do, only that they must be programmed. And in so doing, you just committed the same act you accuse me of making. Only worse since I have given proof of my contention, you have only your opinion to back up your statement.



The category is not humor, so it is not satire. The facts are there. You are welcome to attempt to refute them, but I think that would only make you look foolish.

The sad part of his diatribe is he is demonstrating the left's bunker mentalitiy. It is "you are either for us or against us" thinking and they cannot understand why there are some democrats that do not kowtow to their mindless mantra (and are thus trashed - see Locamama). So if one dares to say that they are independent (as both you and I are), then we are just hiding something. When the truth is we are. I no more like McCain than I do Obama, and have been actively trying to find a reason to vote for Obama, but his supporters are sickening me every day with their hate and stupidity.

I'll go along with ya on McCain/Obama. I don't like either of them and don't feel there's a good choice to be made there.

As for psychx, I also thought he/she was just another left wing loon at first but after interacting with him/her on other threads have found that he/she is actually capable of intelligent thought, reason, and the capability of admitting the use of hyperbole when called on it. Unlike a true loon, he/she is even capable of admitting to being wrong on a point (true un-loon like behavior).

I think, being new, he/she just hasn't yet had the time to learn who is who here and what the backgrounds are of the various bloggers may be. Given time, and if he/she sticks around, I suspect that he/she will turn out to be a pretty intelligent debater and might add a bit of spice to the mix. I think he/she just needs to ratchet down the rhetoric a bit and stick to better discussion techniques.

I actually liked the Bush joke, but you know me, I love humor. The joke was intended to make the point that these violent nut cases don't represent all the left any more than Bush's "putting food on your family" represents the speaking ability of all of the right. Pretty good joke with a pretty good point really.

As I mentioned above I have noticed, just as you have, that there does seem to be a lot of these types of liberals out there; willing to commit violence against people with whom they disagree even though the Left is supposed to be all about peace and people's rights. Obviously it isn't all liberals, but we have had our share of them here who are extremely hateful and lacking in reason that I suspect many of them would also commit such acts. The true Loons.

After reading the posts here (and even the 2nd one here), I agree. And I welcome psychx to the discussion and debates. He just pushed my button with his first comment and second statement. The first being antagonistic, and the second being completely off topic.

I understand, that was also my initial reaction to this person.

That was my thought at first too, he/she seems very quick to jump to conclusions after reading one sentence or paragraph he/she finds weird or cannot figure out where the writer is coming from. He/she seems very articulate and presents some solid arguements, but I for one want to see if she/he can be reached and back down when proven WRONG! or if we have just another " Am right no matter what you say person on our hands"

I agree. But as Mason says, once he is called upon it, he does go back and research and restate.