Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
Threats Will do
Published on October 13, 2006 By Dr Guy In Politics

There is a debate.  Yes, a Debate as there is no conclusive answer yet, much to the chagrin of one side of the debate.  The debate is Global Warming.  And it seems that the Global Warming kooks (note to the easily offended - This does not include all global warming adherents) are loosing the debate, and now want to threaten the other side.  Yes, that bastion of looniness, the Green publication Grist, wants to have "Nuremberg" style trials for anyone that does not agree with their opinions.

WOW!  Where have we heard that before?  Perhaps in Communist China, the Old USSR, North Korea, Cuba, etc.  Notice a pattern emerging here?  Yep!  This 'respectable' magazine, so respectable that Al Gore has decided to use it as a source for his lunacy, has decided that there can be no dissent.  They know everything and anyone who disagrees is a criminal!

And we laughingly thought we had defeated communism!  Laughingly because the brain dead loons on the extreme left are still in love with it and think they can get its return!

But even sadder than their love for a totalitarian regime where no dissent is allowed, is the fact that they think that is the only way their opinions can win out in a debate.  And in that, they are probably right.  For it is clear they lack reason and intelligence and more importantly, FACTS to win the debate.

Just threats.  That is all they have left.  Welcome to the new re-education camps of the 21st century.


Comments (Page 4)
4 PagesFirst 2 3 4 
on Oct 17, 2006
It's a greenhouse gas as is water vapor in that it absorbs longwave radiation. Methane is also a large component of greenhouse gases so ease up on the Mexican food.


Does that mean that Mexico is a large greenhouse emmiter too?
on Oct 17, 2006
Fact: Recent global warming have been exponential. (More temperature changes in the last 5 years than in the 15 years before, more in the last 20 years than in the last 50 years before)


And that demonstrates the biggest hole in the entire debate. Ice core samples clearly show that the planet has been warming up and CO2 increasing for the past 18,000 years and yet people want to cry the sky is falling over 100 years worth of data. Examine the data for the past 18,000 years and you'll find identical warming/cooling spikes throughout that time span, most of which happened well before man industrialized. Many of the warming spikes were actually more pronounced than what has been seen in the past 100 years.

Instead of simply accepting the rhetoric of others as "fact" try doing a little research of your own.

Oh, and by the way, if you don't think that the environmental groups make literally billions of dollars in donations from schmucks worried about the cause of the day, think again. It's a billion dollar business.
on Oct 17, 2006
Billions of dollars? Now, who's pumping out baloney?
on Oct 17, 2006
Billions of dollars? Now, who's pumping out baloney?


Don't accept my word for it. Do some research for yourself and see how much money flows world-wide in the name of environmental research, activism, and lobbying. Then enjoy your baloney sandwich.
on Oct 17, 2006
Oh, just to start you off, check out how much the US goverment gives to environental groups each year. Here's a hint: it's over 3 billion.
on Oct 18, 2006
One group finds that over the past 35 years, the number of Category 4 and 5 storms has nearly doubled worldwide. In the 1970s, roughly 10 of these catastrophic-level storms occurred each season. Since 1990, the number is up to 18 a season, according to Peter Webster, a Georgia Institute of Technology atmospheric scientist who led the study team.

Moreover, these powerful storms made up an increasing share of all storms over time, rising from 20 percent in the 1970s to 35 percent in the '90s. The largest increases in the number of intense hurricanes occurred in the Pacific and Indian Oceans.


Sorry but there are no facts to back up that theory. And the very first line says it all!
on Oct 18, 2006
One group finds that over the past 35 years, the number of Category 4 and 5 storms has nearly doubled worldwide. In the 1970s, roughly 10 of these catastrophic-level storms occurred each season. Since 1990, the number is up to 18 a season, according to Peter Webster, a Georgia Institute of Technology atmospheric scientist who led the study team.


Actually Doc, you forgot part of it. 35 years in the history of the world is not even a millisecond on the time clock. And indeed, part of the increase has nothing to do with mother nature, but Man's ability to track and record the storms more accurately. That they said 35 years is very telling, as many Scientist say that the 90s and oughts are no worse than the 30s. Everyone knows that the storms go in cycles. But looking at a point in time and trying to state what the cycle is, is foolish. And that is what 35 years are to mother nature. A mere point in time.
on Oct 18, 2006
Can you also tell me how much the polluting industry is making? You seems good to get the numbers that fits you.
on Oct 18, 2006
Can you also tell me how much the polluting industry is making? You seems good to get the numbers that fits you.


Which Doc are you asking that of?
on Oct 18, 2006
Which Doc are you asking that of?


Whichever it takes

(hey, this forum isn't such a bad place after all.. just have to take care to avoid some of the extremist..)
on Oct 18, 2006
Which Doc are you asking that of?


Whichever it takes

(hey, this forum isn't such a bad place after all.. just have to take care to avoid some of the extremist..)


Can you also tell me how much the polluting industry is making?


Ok, my turn. Define the polluting industry.   
on Oct 18, 2006
Non-hybrid cars, oil refining, exploiting. Chemicals, power central. Forgetting something?
on Oct 18, 2006
Forgetting something?


Paper and Pulp (take a trip through West Point Va if you want to smell those), Mining, Farming, Steel, Aluminum, Copper, etc.......

Not so easy to name them? Much less quantify them.
4 PagesFirst 2 3 4