Yep!  Sunday proved that adage!  North Korea, and Kim Jung Mentally Il, detonated a nuke.  About the size of the Hiroshima bomb.  And the reaction?  Expected.  Those who condemned Bush for Iraq, a nation that had a nuclear program by EVERY acount just a few years before the invasion, now are condemning Bush for not invading, or at least Nuking North Korea.

Bush's Crime?  He tried Diplomacy, not appeasement (Clinton tried the latter and that is why NK was in the position to test a nuke, but I digress).  And for his efforts in insisting upon multilateral talks, and not uni-lateral talks?  He did wrong.  Yep!  They quote a traitor to America on what he MIGHT have done (but of course he never set forth the steps to do anything), and they point to Clinton and Madam Not-so-Bright as the real course to follow (omitting the fact that it was their policies that advanced the NK Nuclear program).

So out of one side of their mouth, they condemn the 'unilateral' invasion of Iraq (unilateral as in 40 nations, but again I digress), and then out of the other condemn the Multilateral talks that Bush insisted upon.

Bush haters are so easy to spot.  Just check for the forked tongue, or the both sides of the mouth talking.  They cant help but contradict themselves.  Hatred is not logical, and neither are they.