Debate, and discuss, just dont Bore me.
James Cameron Sinks faster than the Titanic
Published on August 25, 2010 By Dr Guy In The Environment

Yes, that ego maniac of movies chickened out.  He likes to threaten people a lot (like shooting them down in the street and wanting to fight them), but when a challenge - BY HIM - to debate Global Warming was accepted by some skeptics, he first went through Orwellian contortions to change the rules (all changes were accepted) before pulling out at the very last minute!

It seems the blow hards (the real source of AGW) are good about denying all the access to the facts and information, and a good and honest debate.  I seem to recall that we do have a term for that.

Oh, yea - Super Chicken!  I think the "green" movement is dying like an un-watered lawn in summer.  They are turning yellow.


Comments (Page 1)
6 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Aug 26, 2010

Just because he made a movie about the environment (Avatar), doesn't make him an expert. I know this guy has an opinion, and he's welcome to it, but just because he is famous doesn't give him a "credibility" pass. BTW Just how much diesel did he burn up in the Atlantic, filming the Titanic, to put some coin in his pocket?

on Aug 26, 2010

BTW Just how much diesel did he burn up in the Atlantic, filming the Titanic, to put some coin in his pocket?

Bu-Bu-but the ships were going there anyway!

I know he is no expert, but he asked and was granted permission to have 2 climate scientists with him.  As it was, after the challenge was accepted, he kept changing the rules hoping the Skeptics would back out.  When they did not, he ran away from it with his tail tucked between his legs.

on Aug 27, 2010

When they did not, he ran away from it with his tail tucked between his legs.

I notice the big media players aren't picking this up. Surprise, surprise.

on Aug 27, 2010

I notice the big media players aren't picking this up. Surprise, surprise.

I hope you did not turn blue holding your breath for that to happen.

on Aug 27, 2010

Hey DG, you would have got a kick out of Hannity tonight. He had a special about the "green scam". Much of it was on global warming.

on Aug 28, 2010

Nitro Cruiser
Hey DG, you would have got a kick out of Hannity tonight. He had a special about the "green scam". Much of it was on global warming.

That would have been great!  Alas, we are dog sitting for the next 2 weeks and the first day was yesterday.  So I spent most of last night trying to figure out how to keep the knot head in the back yard, and then the rest walking him since he will not be kept in!  But he is house broken (and BIG - about 100 pounds), and does not cry or bark.  Of course the cats do not like him (even though he does not hate them).

I will see if I can find it on the Fox site.  But there is more yellow news too!  Seems Wiki is trying to repair its reputation after having it trashed by William Connolley.  He is the Alarmist that kept rewriting all the articles on the site removing any hint that there is a debate about it, and also rewriting the bios of the skeptics putting in slanderous accusations.  It wants the editors to vote of punishment for him.  Alas, their reputation is already trash, so why bother?  no one uses it who wants to be credible.

on Aug 28, 2010

About the only thing I like Wiki for is the reference sources, I will use it movies and such, if I want to know more on trivial matters. I was busy when Hannity was on, but I caught snippets and it seemed  quite well put together. It follows the money trail. I would recommend it to everyone that believes their money on "green" products is really helping, then make up their mind for themselves.

on Aug 29, 2010

And here I thought conservatives didn't care what the "loony lefties" of Hollywood did, or said.

Hypocrite?

It's his life, oh well. Move on with yours, I'm sure you could find something much more intellectually stimulating.

Best. ~M

 

on Aug 29, 2010

And here I thought conservatives didn't care what the "loony lefties" of Hollywood did, or said.

Hypocrite?

Settin' 'em up & knockin' 'em down.  Predictable as night and day.

on Aug 29, 2010

Daiwa

And here I thought conservatives didn't care what the "loony lefties" of Hollywood did, or said.

Hypocrite?
Settin' 'em up & knockin' 'em down.  Predictable as night and day.

 

Come again?

on Aug 29, 2010

And here I thought conservatives didn't care what the "loony lefties" of Hollywood did, or said.

Hypocrite?

References? Quotes? When costs of Hollywood elites whims are being discussed in congress, with potential impact on the taxpayer, who wouldn't care? It is nice to make it up as one goes along. Thanks for adding to the conversation. What exactly was it again?

on Aug 29, 2010

Milonas- you wouldn't by chance be the current incarnation of Lucas, A.K.A. AJ, would you?

on Aug 30, 2010

Milonas
And here I thought conservatives didn't care what the "loony lefties" of Hollywood did, or said.

Hypocrite?

It's his life, oh well. Move on with yours, I'm sure you could find something much more intellectually stimulating.

Best. ~M

I do not have to care about what they believe (as I do not really care about Ted Danson's prediction about the oceans in 10 years, made over 20 years ago), but I do find solace in the fact they do not have the courage of their (misguided) convictions.

Perhaps you live a very vanilla life with no spice in it.  I hope you enjoy it.  But whether he makes super boring movies (Titanic) or super expensive one (Avatar) is his business.  Whether he wants me to pay for his stupidity is my business.

on Aug 30, 2010

Daiwa

And here I thought conservatives didn't care what the "loony lefties" of Hollywood did, or said.

Hypocrite?
Settin' 'em up & knockin' 'em down.  Predictable as night and day.

If you can't discuss/debate the message, attack the messenger!

on Aug 30, 2010

Nitro Cruiser

And here I thought conservatives didn't care what the "loony lefties" of Hollywood did, or said.

Hypocrite?
References? Quotes? When costs of Hollywood elites whims are being discussed in congress, with potential impact on the taxpayer, who wouldn't care? It is nice to make it up as one goes along. Thanks for adding to the conversation. What exactly was it again?

Thank you for stating it move succinctly than I did.

6 Pages1 2 3  Last